De-La-Cruz v. United States (2012)
green
· 5 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Martinez-Hernandez v. United States (2020)
See, e.g., Singleton v. United States, 26 F.3d 233, 240 (1st Cir.1994) (citations omitted) (“Section 2255 motions may not be used as vehicles to re-litigate issues that were raised on appeal absent extraordinary circumstances, such as intervening change of law or newly discovered evidence.”); Conley v. United States, 323 F.3d 7, 22 (1st Cir. 2003) (“Claims that previously have been addressed on direct review, however, may not be readjudicated collaterally under § 2255 absent…
green
Ocasio-Ruiz v. United States (2020)
See, e.g., Singleton v. United States, 26 F.3d 233, 240 (1st Cir.1994) (citations omitted) (“Section 2255 motions may not be used as vehicles to re-litigate issues that were raised on appeal absent extraordinary circumstances, such as intervening change of law or newly discovered evidence.”); Conley v. United States, 323 F.3d 7, 22 (1st Cir. 2003) (“Claims that previously have been addressed on direct review, however, may not be readjudicated collaterally under § 2255 absent…
green
Villega-Angulo v. United States (2016)
“Second, a defendant must establish that prejudice resulted ‘in consequence of counsel’s blunders,’ which entails ‘a showing of a “reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” ’ ” Rosado v. Allen, 482 F.Supp.2d at 101 (quoting Scarpa v. DuBois, 38 F.3d at 8 ) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ); see Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1482 , 176…
green
Santos-Martinez v. United States (2015)
Rodriquez v. United States, 395 U.S. 327 , 89 S.Ct. 1715 , 23 L.Ed.2d 340 (1969); see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. at 686-87 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; United States v. Downs-Moses, 329 F.3d 253, 265 (1st Cir.2003); cf. De-La-Cruz v. United States, 865 F.Supp.2d 156, 167 (D.P.R.2012).
green
Ramirez-Burgos v. United States (2013)
“Second, a defendant must establish that prejudice resulted ‘in consequence of counsel’s blunders,’ which entails ‘a showing of a “reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” ’ ” Rosado v. Allen, 482 F.Supp.2d at 101 (quoting Scarpa v. Dubois, 38 F.3d at 8 ) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ); see Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 , 130 S.Ct. 1473, 1482 , 176…