How cited: Victoria L. v. District School Board · Go Syfert

Victoria L. v. District School Board (1984)

green · 41 citation events across 20 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Yellow 2 Green 19
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
yellow Clifford Burr, by His Parents and Next Friends, Kenneth Burr, Betty Burr v. Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of… (1988)
But See · 2d Cir. · signal: but see
But see Victoria L. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369 (11th Cir.1984).
yellow Holmes Ex Rel. Holmes v. Sobol (1988)
But See · W.D.N.Y. · signal: but cf.
But cf Victoria L. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984); Brandon E. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Public Instruction, 595 F.Supp. 740, 746 (E.D.Wis.1984).
green Honig v. Doe (1988)
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
Petitioner Bill Honig, California Superintendent of Public Instruction, 4 sought review in this Court, claiming that the Court of Appeals’ construction of the stay-put provision conflicted with that of several other Courts of Appeals which had recognized a dangerousness exception, compare Doe v. Maher, supra (case below), with Jackson v. Franklin County School Board, 765 F. 2d 535, 538 (CA5 1985); Victoria L. v. District School Bd. of Lee County, Fla., 741 F. 2d 369, 374 (CA…
green Church of Scientology Flag Service Org., Inc. v. City of Clearwater (1993)
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 373 (11th Cir.1984) (dictum), this holding appears to have been overruled in part by Celotex.
green Ojai Unified School District v. Jackson (1993)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Bd. of Lee County, 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984) (rejecting the argument that the IDEA precludes the use of summary judgment and noting that “[njothing in the language or legislative histoiy of the [IDEA] suggests that Congress intended to dispense with the wholesome utility of summary judgment") (quotation omitted).
green Muth v. Central Bucks School District (1988)
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Similarly, in Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984), the argument that the Florida Commissioner of Education could not review the decision of the initial local hearing officer was held to be frivolous. 14 We respectfully disagree with these decisions. 63 In the EHA, Congress has indicated its desire to provide parents with decisionmakers who are not subject to the kind of pressures that employees of an educational agency would nece…
green Muth v. Central Bucks School District (1988)
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Similarly, in Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984), the argument that the Florida Commissioner of Education could not review the decision of the initial local hearing officer was held to be frivolous. 14 We respectfully disagree with these decisions.
green School Board of Pinellas County v. J.M. Ex Rel. L.M. (1997)
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Jackson v. Franklin County School Board, 765 F.2d 535 (5th Cir.1985); Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Board of Lee County, Florida, 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984).
green Moubry ex rel. Moubry v. Independent School District Number 696 (1996)
Quote Authority · D. Minnesota · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984) (“Nothing in the language or legislative history of the [IDEA] suggests that Congress intended to dispense with the “wholesome utility’ of summary judgment.”).
“Nothing in the language or legislative history of the [IDEA] suggests that Congress intended to dispense with the “wholesome utility’ of summary judgment.”
green Norton School Committee v. Massachusetts Department of Education (1991)
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
By Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984); Bertolucci v. San Carlos Elementary School Dist., 721 F.Supp. 1150, 1153 (N.D.Cal.1989); Barwacz v. Michigan Dep’t of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1301 (W.D.Mich.1987); see Westmoreland School Dist., 930 F.2d at 946 .
green Louis M. Ex Rel. Velma M. v. Ambach (1989)
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984), Brandon E. v. Wisconsin Dep’t. of Public Instruction, 595 F.Supp. 740, 746 (E.D.Wis.1984).
green Hollenbeck v. Board of Educ. of Rochelle Tp. (1988)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
C.1986); Victoria L. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984).
green Barwacz v. Michigan Department of Education (1987)
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
By Carol A. v. District School Board of Lee County, Florida, 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984).
green Vander Malle v. Ambach (1987)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
By Carol A. v. District School Board of Lee County, Florida, 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984).
green Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico (1986)
Rule Authority · D.P.R.
See Singer v. Wadman, 745 F.2d 606, 608-9 (10th Cir.1984) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1396 , 84 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985) (summary judgment available in civil rights conspiracy case); Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 373 (11th Cir.1984) (Rule 56 applied to Education of the Handicapped Act case); Miller v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1020, 1025-26 (8th Cir.1984) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 145 , 83 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985) (in prisoner civil rights case court r…
green Muth v. Smith (1986)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Similarly, the court in Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984), dismissed the argument that the Florida Commissioner of Edu *285 cation could not conduct a review of the hearing findings as frivolous.
green Bonadonna v. Cooperman (1985)
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
See also Manecke v. School Board of Pinellas County, Florida, 762 F.2d 912, 919-20 (11th Cir.1985) (attorney’s fees available under § 1988 where “the local educational agency deprives a handicapped child of due process by effectively denying that child access to the heart of the [EAHCA] administrative machinery, the impartial due process hearing”), citing Rose v. Nebraska, 748 F.2d 1258 , 1263 (8th Cir.1984); Teresa Diane P. v. Alief Independent School District, 744 F.2d 484…
green Offshore Aviation v. Transcon Lines, Inc. (1987)
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 373 (11th Cir.1984); Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon, 632 F.2d 539, 559 (5th Cir.1980); 1 Broadway v. City of Montgomery, 530 F.2d 657, 661 (5th Cir.1976), Roucher v. Traders & General Ins.
green Ass'n for Retarded Citizens of Alabama, Inc. v. Teague (1987)
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see
See Victoria L. v. District School Board of Lee County, Fla., 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984) (conclusory assertion that defendants violated due process by not complying with EHA procedural provisions failed to survive summary judgment motion).
green Doe v. Maher (1986)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: accord
Sec. 1415 (e)(2), "schools have discretion to alter a handicapped student's placement when he endangers himself or others and threatens to disrupt a safe school environment." Jackson, 765 F.2d at 538 ; accord Victoria L. by Carol A. v. District School Board, 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984).
green Rondal D. Cain, Darla A. Cain, and Mark Cain v. Yukon Public Schools, District I-27 (1985)
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Grymes v. Madden, 672 F.2d 321, 323 (3d Cir.1982) (per curiam), and Helms v. McDaniel, 657 F.2d 800 , 806 n. 9 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 946 , 102 S.Ct. 1443 , 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982), with Victoria L. v. District School Board of Lee County, 741 F.2d 369, 374 (11th Cir.1984).