How cited: Gavin v. Heckler · Go Syfert

Gavin v. Heckler (1987)

green · 474 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 50
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green William L. Minor, Sr. v. Michael Astrue (2009)
Quote Authority · 8th Cir.
See also Burress v. Apfel, 141 F.3d 875, 878 (8th Cir. 1998) (“As this court has repeatedly stated, the ‘substantial evidence in the record as a whole’ standard is not synonymous with the less rigorous ‘substantial evidence’ standard.”); Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987) (“It is not sufficient for the district court to simply say there exists substantial evidence supporting the [Commissioner] and therefore the [Commissioner] must be sustained.”).
“It is not sufficient for the district court to simply say there exists substantial evidence supporting the [Commissioner] and therefore the [Commissioner] must be sustained.”
green Lee v. Social Security Administration (2022)
Rule Authority · D.N.D. · 2 citations in this opinion
“There is a notable difference between ‘substantial evidence’ and ‘substantial evidence on the 4 record as whole.’” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987) (quotation omitted).
quotation omitted
green Julia C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Richard C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Christopher G. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Linda Marie G. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Baltierra v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Dickau v. Social Security Administration (2025)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Willett v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Grover v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Travis v. Kijakazi (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Racer v. Kijakazi (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
The “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Sands v. Social Security Administration (2024)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Hennings v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Jones v. Kijakazi (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Petersen v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Bennett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Tenn.
Thus, it remains to be determined whether the finding of plaintiff’s literacy is properly supported.” (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Knox v. Kijakazi (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Servs., 879 F.2d 441, 444 (8th Cir. 1989) (citing Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Benson v. Kijakazi (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Abraham v. Kijakazi (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green SMITH v. KIJAKAZI (2023)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1200 (8th Cir.1987).
green Ivy v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)) (alteration in original).
green Deck v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)) (alteration in original).
green Esselman v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Bradley v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)) (alteration in original).
green Ellis v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green White v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
The substantial evidence test, however, requires “‘more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.’” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987) (alteration in original)).
alteration in original
green Lawson v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)) (alteration in original).
green Schilling v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Said v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Shaw v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)) (alteration in original).
green Ozment v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Zoch v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1201 (8th Cir. 1987); see also Beeler v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 124, 127 (8th Cir. 1987) (finding reversal of denial of benefits was proper where “the total record overwhelmingly supports a finding of disability”); Stephens v. Sec’y of Health, Educ., & Welfare, 603 F.2d 36, 42 (8th Cir. 1979) (explaining that reversal of denial of benefits is justified where no substantial evidence exists to support a finding that the claimant is not disabled).
green Jeidy v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Wakefield v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Davis v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Hanson v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
This test requires “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the Secretary’s findings.” Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Malchow v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
“Substantial evidence in the record as a whole requires a more searching review than the substantial evidence standard.” Grindley, 9 F.4th at 627 ; Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Mitchell v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
“Substantial evidence in the record as a whole requires a more searching review than the substantial evidence standard.” Grindley, 9 F.4th at 627 ; Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Houlihan v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
“Substantial evidence in the record as a whole requires a more searching review than the substantial evidence standard.” Grindley, 9 F.4th at 627 ; Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Wydrzynski v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Rubottom-Langeneckert v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Wadi v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
But “[s]ubstantial evidence in the record as a whole requires a more searching review than the substantial evidence standard.” Grindley, 9 F.4th at 627 ; Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Schaefer v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Boyd v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
But “[s]ubstantial evidence in the record as a whole requires a more searching review than the substantial evidence standard.” Grindley, 9 F.4th at 627; Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987).
green Wilbers v. Kijakazi (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Coleman v. Kijakazi (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green Madry v. Kijakazi (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
This “substantial evidence test,” however, is “more than a mere search of the record for evidence supporting the [Commissioner’s] findings.” Coleman v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 767, 770 (8th Cir. 2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir. 1987)).
green CAIANO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2019)
Quote Authority · D.N.J.
This case presents the rare circumstance in which a judicial award of disability benefits is merited. “[A] judicial award of benefits would be proper where the proof of disability is overwhelming or where the proof is very strong and there is no contrary evidence.” Seavey v. Barnhart, 276 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 2001); Faucher v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 17 5 F.3d 171 , 176 (6th Cir. 1994) (same); Gavin v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 1195, 1201 (8th Cir. 1987) (“where the tota…
“where the total record is overwhelmingly in support of a finding of disability and the claimant has demonstrated his disability by medical evidence on the record as a whole, we find no need to remand.”