Broecker v. New York City Department of Education (2022)
green
· 15 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wendy Trudo v. The Department of Education of the City of New York; Melissa Aviles-Ramos, Chancellor; Katheri… (2026)
Moreover, Plaintiff's “ability to request the exemption and appeal constituted an adequate pre-termination opportunity to respond, and her ability to pursue Article 78 remedies satisfied the post-termination administrative procedures as provided by state statute for her to have received due process.” Hurley, 2025 WL 2711471 , at *10; see also Broecker, 585 F. Supp. 3d at 314 (“Plaintiffs, having received multiple notices regarding the Vaccination Mandate and after being noti…
“Plaintiffs, having received multiple notices regarding the Vaccination Mandate and after being notified of the applicable dates, procedures, and consequences regarding continued noncompliance with the Vaccination Mandate, could still have sought relief through an Article 78 proceeding in New York …
green
Maria Giannakoulis v. The Department of Education of the City of New York and Melissa Aviles-Ramos, individua… (2026)
See Broecker, 585 F. Supp. 3d at 319 (“[B]ecause the Court finds that receiving a vaccination against COVID-19 is a condition of employment for NYC DOE employees, the NYC DOE need not pursue the disciplinary procedures contained in New York Education Law Section 3020-a . . . prior to terminating NYC DOE employees due to their noncompliance with the Vaccination Mandate.”).
“[B]ecause the Court finds that receiving a vaccination against COVID-19 is a condition of employment for NYC DOE employees, the NYC DOE need not pursue the disciplinary procedures contained in New York Education Law Section 3020-a . . . prior to terminating NYC DOE employees due to their noncompli…
Broecker, 585 F. Supp. 3d at 316-17.
green
Chinchilla v. New York City Police Department (2024)
Dep’t of Educ., 585 F. Supp. 3d 299 , 314 (E.D.N.Y. 2022) (“The Court finds that the Vaccination Mandate is a lawful condition of employment and, thus, upon termination, Plaintiffs have been provided constitutionally adequate process under their applicable CBAs as affected by the relevant Arbitration Awards or agreements and all relevant state statutes.”); Marciano v. de Blasio, 589 F. Supp. 3d 423 , 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2022) (“Marciano has failed to satisfy a condition of his emp…
“The Court finds that the Vaccination Mandate is a lawful condition of employment and, thus, upon termination, Plaintiffs have been provided constitutionally adequate process under their applicable CBAs as affected by the relevant Arbitration Awards or agreements and all relevant state statutes.”
green
Winston Davis v. Charlene Spencer, et al. (2026)
Am. Postal Workers Union v. USPS, 766 F.2d 715 , 721 (2d Cir. 1985) (“[E]xcept in a ‘genuinely extraordinary situation,’ irreparable harm is not shown in employee discharge cases simply by a showing of financial distress or difficulties in obtaining other employment.”); see Williams v. State Univ. of New York, 635 F. Supp. 1243 (E.D.N.Y. 1986) (describing extraordinary circumstances as, for example, where the plaintiff (1) “has very little chance of securing further employme…
green
AUTERI v. VIA AFFILIATES (2024)
See Broecker v. New York City Dep’t of Educ., 585 F. Supp. 3d 299 , 314-16 (E.D.N.Y. 2022).