convictions error (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

convictions error in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Desmond Turner v. State of Indianagreen
ind · 2011 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Turner v. State, 953 N.E.2d 1039, 1059 (Ind. 2011).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Speybroeck v. State green
indctapp · 2007
2 sentences

2016Speybroeck, 875 N.E.2d at 822 .

2016Speybroeck, 875 N.E.2d at 822 .

22016–2016
Boatner v. State green
indctapp · 2010
1 sentence

2015Id. [14] For all of these reasons, the trial court acted within its discretion when it determined that Jasmine placed the 911 call while under the stress of excitement caused by the startling event and admitted the 911 call into evidence under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. [15] Even if the trial court erred in admitting the 911 call into evidence, we will not reverse the convictions if the error was harmless.

12015–2015
Ryle v. State green
ind · 2005
1 sentence

2013Finally, Jones asks this Court to reconsider our Supreme Court’s holding in Ryle v. State, 842 N.E.2d 320 (Ind. 2005), that juvenile adjudications fall within the prior convictions exception and do not have to be submitted to the jury before they can be used to enhance a sentence.

12013–2013
United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John Martins green
ca5 · 1980
1 sentence

1981United States v. Rodriquez, (5th Cir. 1980) 612 F.2d 906 ; United States v. Marotta, (9th Cir. 1975) 518 F.2d 681 . 5 .

11981–1981
United States v. Thomas Nicholas Marotta green
ca9 · 1975
1 sentence

1981United States v. Rodriquez, (5th Cir. 1980) 612 F.2d 906 ; United States v. Marotta, (9th Cir. 1975) 518 F.2d 681 . 5 .

11981–1981

Where else courts name it

GA 20 (1986–2024) WA 12 (1986–2016) CA 10 (1968–2026) IL 8 (1980–2025) FL 8 (1991–2025) TX 6 (2002–2021) MO 6 (1983–2011) IN 5 (1981–2016) LA 5 (2007–2018) NJ 4 (1996–2014) AZ 4 (2005–2016) MI 3 (1979–2015) VA 3 (2003–2018) AL 3 (1998–1999) MA 3 (1978–2017) AR 2 (2003–2022) MD 2 (1973–1986) NY 2 (1997–2014) OR 2 (1980–1980) NH 2 (1980–2013) PA 2 (1974–1980) MN 2 (2005–2016) ND 2 (2013–2013) MS 2 (1994–2010) CT 2 (1987–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check