Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zebrowski & Associates, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis Ex Rel. Board of Directors for Utilities of Department of Public Utilitiesgreen2 sentences2025See Recticel Foam, 716 N.E.2d at 1027 (“Because Wausau has a duty to defend Recticel, Wausau is liable for the reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by Recticel in defending the actions.”); see also Zebrowski & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Indianapolis, 457 N.E.2d 259, 264 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983) (“An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees.”). [69] Safway does not contest the trial court’s award of NIPSCO’s defense cost 2018Utilities , which is cited by BioConvergence and Alisa, the Court held: "An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees." 457 N.E.2d 259 , 264 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983) (citing Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Citizens Nat'l Bank of Peru , 85 Ind. App. 169 , 151 N.E. 396 (1926) ). | 2 | 3 |
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Recticel Foam Corp.green1 sentence2025See Recticel Foam, 716 N.E.2d at 1027 (“Because Wausau has a duty to defend Recticel, Wausau is liable for the reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by Recticel in defending the actions.”); see also Zebrowski & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Indianapolis, 457 N.E.2d 259, 264 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983) (“An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees.”). [69] Safway does not contest the trial court’s award of NIPSCO’s defense cost | 1 | 1 |
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp.green1 sentence2004Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp., 654 N.E.2d 1163, 1169 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) ("An indem-nitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees"), reh'g denied, trans. demied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Citizens National Bank of Peru
green
2 sentences2018Utilities , which is cited by BioConvergence and Alisa, the Court held: "An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees." 457 N.E.2d 259 , 264 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983) (citing Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Citizens Nat'l Bank of Peru , 85 Ind. App. 169 , 151 N.E. 396 (1926) ). 2018Utilities , which is cited by BioConvergence and Alisa, the Court held: "An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees." 457 N.E.2d 259 , 264 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983) (citing Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Citizens Nat'l Bank of Peru , 85 Ind. App. 169 , 151 N.E. 396 (1926) ). | 2 | 1983–2018 |
BioConvergence, LLC, and Alisa K. Wright v. Julie Menefee
green
1 sentence2020Accordingly, the Simon Parties were entitled to recover their reasonable attorney fees and costs for prosecution of the cross-claim against Smarte Carte to enforce the indemnification provision. [33] Further, we noted in BioConvergence that: “An indemnitee, who incurs legal expenses through defending an action against him for which he is entitled to indemnification, is entitled to recover the expense of creating his defense, including reasonable attorney fees.” BioConvergence, 103 N.E.3d at 1170 (quoting Zebrowski & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Indianapolis, By & Through its Bd. of Directors for U | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Price v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY
green
1 sentence2018The Court held that "[t]he indemnitee may recover attorney fees from the indemnitor incurred through an original action which is settled, and also for the cost of prosecuting the indemnity clause." Id. (citing Price v. Amoco Oil Co. , 524 F.Supp. 364 (S.D. | 1 | 2018–2018 |