Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–1982 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richmond v. State
neutral
2 sentences1982Richmond v. State, (1979) Ind., 387 N.E.2d 1312 . 1980Richmond v. State (1979), Ind., 387 N.E.2d 1312 . | 2 | 1980–1982 |
Carter v. State
green
2 sentences1979Carter v. State (1977) Ind., 361 N.E.2d 1208 . 1979Carter v. State (1977) Ind., 361 N.E.2d 1208 . | 2 | 1979–1979 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1980Said opinion contravened a ruling precedent of this Court, to-wit: Smith v. State, (1979) Ind., 388 N.E.2d 484 , wherein it was stated that “Instructions should be read as a whole and the impact of the entire instruction should be considered in determining reversible error.” Accordingly, that decision and opinion are hereby vacated, and the State’s petition to transfer is hereby granted. | 1 | 1980–1980 |