seizure violation (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

seizure violation in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1884–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
California v. Hodari D. green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

2005In California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 , 111 S.Ct. 1547 , 113 L.Ed. 2d 690 (1991), the Supreme Court had to determine whether abandoned evidence was the fruit of a seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

2005In California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 , 111 S.Ct. 1547 , 113 L.Ed. 2d 690 (1991), the Supreme Court had to determine whether abandoned evidence was the fruit of a seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

21991–2005
Terry v. Ohio green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1996He does not contest the validity of the initial stop or the pat-down of his person. 1 In Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , the Supreme Court held that a police officer may stop a person when he reasonably suspects that the person has committed a crime.

1996He does not contest the validity of the initial stop or the pat-down of his person. 1 In Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , the Supreme Court held that a police officer may stop a person when he reasonably suspects that the person has committed a crime.

11996–1996
Delaware v. Prouse green
scotus · 1979
2 sentences

1988Since the State has a legitimate interest in insuring that motor vehicles are fit for safe operation, Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 659 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1399 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 , we must consider whether the situation presented here is one in which there is at least articu-lable and reasonable suspicion that either the vehicle or its occupant was properly subject to a seizure for a violation of law.

1988Since the State has a legitimate interest in insuring that motor vehicles are fit for safe operation, Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648, 659 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1399 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 , we must consider whether the situation presented here is one in which there is at least articu-lable and reasonable suspicion that either the vehicle or its occupant was properly subject to a seizure for a violation of law.

11988–1988
Miller v. Ashton neutral
ind · 1844
1 sentence

1884In McIntosh v. Chew, 1 Blackf 289, the court said: “ Where the goods of a defendant have been taken in execution, whether they are sold or not, the seizure is a bar to any other execution against him for the same debt.” To the same effect are Miller v. Ashton, 7 Blackf. 29 , and Lindley v. Kelley, 42 Ind. 294 .

11884–1884
Lindley v. Kelley green
ind · 1873
1 sentence

1884In McIntosh v. Chew, 1 Blackf 289, the court said: “ Where the goods of a defendant have been taken in execution, whether they are sold or not, the seizure is a bar to any other execution against him for the same debt.” To the same effect are Miller v. Ashton, 7 Blackf. 29 , and Lindley v. Kelley, 42 Ind. 294 .

11884–1884

Where else courts name it

IL 22 (1924–2023) WA 16 (2001–2024) PA 15 (1965–2024) DC 15 (1978–2019) CA 9 (1936–2016) TX 9 (1984–2015) NC 8 (2013–2022) WI 8 (2001–2024) OR 7 (1993–2026) NH 6 (1991–2020) OH 6 (1996–2024) NY 6 (1973–2024) IN 5 (1884–2005) FL 5 (1983–2010) VA 4 (1995–2022) MA 4 (2019–2025) CO 4 (2002–2025) IA 3 (2015–2023) TN 3 (1998–2022) MO 3 (1989–2001) MI 3 (1975–2008) GA 3 (1984–1997) KS 2 (2008–2010) ID 2 (1991–2011) VT 2 (1988–2004) NV 2 (2015–2015) LA 2 (1975–2012) NM 2 (2006–2006) MN 2 (1987–1999) NJ 2 (1979–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check