showing of a meritorious claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

showing of a meritorious claim in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. Markleygreen
ind · 2006 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2007–2020
2 sentences

2020That requires a showing “‘that vacating the judgment will not be an empty exercise.’” Outback Steakhouse of Florida v. Markley, 856 N.E.2d 65, 73 (Ind. 2006) (quoting 12 Moore’s 2 In support of his contention that the trial court should set aside the dismissal due to the trial court’s “clerical error,” Bell cites to case law addressing Trial Rule 60(A), which permits a trial court to correct technical clerical errors in judgments or orders.

2007That requires a showing “ ‘that vacating the judgment will not be an empty exercise.’” Outback Steakhouse of Florida v. Markley, 856 N.E.2d 65, 73 (Ind.2006) (quoting 12 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 60.43[l][c] (3d ed.1997)).

22
Munster Community Hospital v. Bernackegreen
indctapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020See Munster Cmty. Hosp. v. Bernacke, 874 N.E.2d 611, 614 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).

2020See Munster Cmty. Hosp. v. Bernacke, 874 N.E.2d 611, 614 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).

22
In Re Paternity of PSSgreen
ind · 2010 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020“The burden is on the movant to establish ground[s] for Trial Rule 60(B) relief.” In re Paternity of P.S.S., 934 N.E.2d 737, 740 (Ind. 2010). [17] Trial Rule 60(B) requires that allegations of mistake or excusable neglect under Trial Rule 60(B)(1) or any reason justifying relief under Trial Rule 60(B)(8) must be supported by a showing of a meritorious claim.

11
Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan Ribeye Franchise, Inc.green
ind · 1991 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996See Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan Ribeye Franchise, Inc., 572 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1991); Tardy v. Chumrley, 658 N.E.2d 959 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, *46 Inc., 559 N.E.2d 366 (Ind.Ct.App.1990); Lake County Trust Co. v. Gainer Bank, N.A., 555 N.E.2d 1356 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), reh. denied, trans. denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Lake County Trust Co. v. Gainer Bank, N.A. green
indctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1996See Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan Ribeye Franchise, Inc., 572 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1991); Tardy v. Chumrley, 658 N.E.2d 959 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, *46 Inc., 559 N.E.2d 366 (Ind.Ct.App.1990); Lake County Trust Co. v. Gainer Bank, N.A., 555 N.E.2d 1356 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), reh. denied, trans. denied.

11996–1996
Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, Inc. green
indctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1996See Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan Ribeye Franchise, Inc., 572 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1991); Tardy v. Chumrley, 658 N.E.2d 959 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, *46 Inc., 559 N.E.2d 366 (Ind.Ct.App.1990); Lake County Trust Co. v. Gainer Bank, N.A., 555 N.E.2d 1356 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), reh. denied, trans. denied.

11996–1996
Tardy v. Chumrley green
indctapp · 1995
1 sentence

1996See Shotwell v. Cliff Hagan Ribeye Franchise, Inc., 572 N.E.2d 487 (Ind.1991); Tardy v. Chumrley, 658 N.E.2d 959 (Ind.Ct.App.1995); Morrison v. Professional Billing Services, *46 Inc., 559 N.E.2d 366 (Ind.Ct.App.1990); Lake County Trust Co. v. Gainer Bank, N.A., 555 N.E.2d 1356 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), reh. denied, trans. denied.

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

NY 33 (1961–2026) AL 30 (1983–2024) TX 13 (1977–2022) NJ 11 (1953–2025) IL 10 (1910–2026) PA 9 (1973–2019) TN 8 (1986–2015) MI 8 (1962–2020) GA 7 (1997–2023) AZ 7 (1966–2019) MO 6 (1913–2001) NC 5 (1937–2009) IN 5 (1996–2020) CA 5 (1952–2025) WA 5 (1931–2019) AR 5 (1895–1981) FL 4 (1978–1988) UT 4 (2000–2015) ND 4 (1980–2022) ID 3 (1994–2012) SC 3 (1983–2011) DC 3 (1985–2004) MT 3 (1959–2021) WY 2 (1945–2021) OK 2 (1988–1988) NM 2 (1973–2005) IA 2 (1942–1976) MN 2 (1924–1928) MD 2 (1988–2010) OH 2 (2002–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check