Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kuiper v. Andersongreen2 sentences2016In the larger sense, the stability in surroundings, schooling, relationships, authority figures, daily routine, economic circumstances, etc. constitute a substantial determinant in assessing the statutorily enumerated factors relevant to a determination of the best interests of the child.” Id. (quoting Kuiper v. Anderson, 634 N.E.2d 556, 558 (Ind.Ct.App.1994)). [29] Here, Father presented uncontra-dicted evidence of his housing and A.M.’s current positive living situation, her schooling, her friendships, her church attendance, her extra-curricular activities, and her medical and dental care. 2014Kuiper v. Anderson, 634 N.E.2d 556, 558 (Ind.Ct.App.1994). | 2 | 2 |
Russell v. Russellgreen1 sentence2014Russell v. Russell, 682 N.E.2d 513, 515 (Ind. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Haley v. Haleygreen1 sentence2003Ind.Code § 81-17-2-21 (1998 & Supp. 2002); Haley v. Haley, 771 N.E.2d 743, 747 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kirk v. Kirk
green
1 sentence2016In the larger sense, the stability in surroundings, schooling, relationships, authority figures, daily routine, economic circumstances, etc. constitute a substantial determinant in assessing the statutorily enumerated factors relevant to a determination of the best interests of the child.” Id. (quoting Kuiper v. Anderson, 634 N.E.2d 556, 558 (Ind.Ct.App.1994)). [29] Here, Father presented uncontra-dicted evidence of his housing and A.M.’s current positive living situation, her schooling, her friendships, her church attendance, her extra-curricular activities, and her medical and dental care. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Apple v. State
green
2 sentences1982In Apple v. State, (1973) 158 Ind.App. 663, 671 , 304 N.E.2d 321, 325-26 , the Court referring to the predecessor of Ind.Code § 35-5-5-2, which contains the same language, stated the following: “Apple next argues that the court erred in failing to make a detailed finding of record on each of the elements to be considered in determining the volun-tariness of the confession, including also the element of delay in obtaining the confession after arrest. 1982In Apple v. State, (1973) 158 Ind.App. 663, 671 , 304 N.E.2d 321, 325-26 , the Court referring to the predecessor of Ind.Code § 35-5-5-2, which contains the same language, stated the following: “Apple next argues that the court erred in failing to make a detailed finding of record on each of the elements to be considered in determining the volun-tariness of the confession, including also the element of delay in obtaining the confession after arrest. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.