tender defense (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

tender defense in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. J.L. Manta, Inc.green
indctapp · 1999 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2017
2 sentences

2017Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 77A01-1612-CT-2899 | June 13, 2017 Page 5 of 13 Id. at 1282 (emphases added). [9] The Estate cites Auto-Owners’ coverage position letter as evidence that it agreed to cover Uptown on the Estate’s Section 314A claim for failure to aid.

2008Id.

12
Ludy v. Stategreen
ind · 2003 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013See id. at 462 n.2 (listing numerous cases affirming the use of the challenged instruction).

11
Royal Insurance v. Process Design Associates, Inc.green
illappct · 1991 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008Co. v. Process Design Assocs., Inc., 221 Ill.App.3d 966 , 164 Ill.Dec. 290 , 582 N.E.2d 1234, 1239 (1991) (noting that a reservation of rights must adequately inform the insured of the rights which the insurer intends to reserve for it is only when the insured is adequately informed of the potential policy defenses that he can intelligently choose between retaining his own counsel or accepting the tender of defense counsel from insurer).

2008Co. v. Process Design Assocs., Inc., 221 Ill.App.3d 966 , 164 Ill.Dec. 290 , 582 N.E.2d 1234, 1239 (1991) (noting that a reservation of rights must adequately inform the insured of the rights which the insurer intends to reserve for it is only when the insured is adequately informed of the potential policy defenses that he can intelligently choose between retaining his own counsel or accepting the tender of defense counsel from insurer).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Kirchoff v. Selby green
indctapp · 1997
1 sentence

1998Kirchoff, 686 N.E.2d at 131 n. 11.

11998–1998
Lacy v. State green
ind · 1982
1 sentence

1985Lacy v. State, (1982) Ind., 438 N.E.2d 968 ; Crosson v. State, (1980) 274 Ind. 247 , 410 N.E.2d 1194 .

11985–1985
Crosson v. State green
ind · 1980
2 sentences

1985Lacy v. State, (1982) Ind., 438 N.E.2d 968 ; Crosson v. State, (1980) 274 Ind. 247 , 410 N.E.2d 1194 .

1985Lacy v. State, (1982) Ind., 438 N.E.2d 968 ; Crosson v. State, (1980) 274 Ind. 247 , 410 N.E.2d 1194 .

11985–1985

Where else courts name it

CA 168 (1962–2026) IL 62 (1917–2024) WA 23 (1923–2024) WI 16 (1875–2019) MI 15 (1978–2023) OR 13 (1936–2017) GA 12 (1950–2019) HI 12 (1983–2025) MN 11 (1987–2010) AZ 7 (2004–2019) UT 7 (1989–2024) TX 6 (1919–2018) OH 5 (1910–2020) AK 5 (1976–1993) IN 5 (1985–2017) MD 4 (1972–1984) MO 4 (1986–1999) NE 3 (1891–1996) MT 3 (1944–2009) LA 3 (1931–1986) NY 3 (1919–1947) TN 3 (1883–1991) NJ 2 (2012–2026) CO 2 (1934–1986) NV 2 (1993–2021) ID 2 (1980–1987)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check