accuracy test (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

accuracy test in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1926–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Winquistgreen
iowa · 1976 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009The list of people authorized to withdraw blood under K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1001(c) indicates that the legislature wanted to ensure that blood withdraws would be performed in such a way as to protect the health of the individual whose blood was being withdrawn, “to guard against infection and pain, and to assure the accuracy of the test.” State v. Winquist, 247 N.W.2d 256, 258-59 (Iowa 1976) (interpreting an Iowa statute similar to *574 K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1001[c]); K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1001(v) (“This act is remedial law and shall be liberally construed to promote public health, safety and welfar

2009The test to determine whether a person holding himself out as a medical technologist is a medical technologist within the meaning of [Iowa’s implied consent law] is whether a satisfactory showing can be made that he has sufficient training in the withdrawal of blood to accomplish the legislative objectives of protecting the individual’s health, guarding against infection and pain, and assuring the accuracy of the test, all in accordance with accepted medical standards. [Citations omitted.] The concern is with the competence of the person withdrawing tire blood rather than with an occupational

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Sawyer green
kan · 2013
1 sentence

2024Moyer, 306 Kan. at 376 ; Sawyer, 297 Kan. at 909 .

12024–2024
State v. Moyer green
kan · 2015
1 sentence

2024Moyer, 306 Kan. at 376 ; Sawyer, 297 Kan. at 909 .

12024–2024
State v. Stegman green
kanctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2010App.2d 568, 573 , 203 P.3d 52 (2009) ("The list of people authorized to withdraw blood under K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1001[c] indicates that the legislature wanted to ensure that blood withdraws would be performed in such a way as to protect the health of the individual whose blood was being withdrawn, `to guard against infection and pain, and to assure the accuracy of the test. ' [Citations omitted.]" [Emphasis added.]).

12010–2010
Shepard v. Pratt neutral
kan · 1876
1 sentence

1937In Shepard v. Pratt, 16 Kan. 209, 213 , where the accuracy of an instruction on an issue of partnership was under scrutiny, Mr. Justice Brewer said: “It is not true that an equal division of the profits always and under all circumstances constitutes a partnership.

11937–1937
State v. Johnson green
kan · 1921
2 sentences

1926Concerning that case it is said, in State v. Johnson, 109 Kan. 239, 241 , 199 Pac. 104 : “The rule of that case is founded upon, the generality of the term bailee and the different kinds of responsibility that may grow out of that relationship; it has no application where the embezzlement is charged to have been committed by an officer of a corporation.” The accuracy of the rule announced in State v. Griffith, supra, is debatable at the best (see 20 C.

1926Concerning that case it is said, in State v. Johnson, 109 Kan. 239, 241 , 199 Pac. 104 : “The rule of that case is founded upon, the generality of the term bailee and the different kinds of responsibility that may grow out of that relationship; it has no application where the embezzlement is charged to have been committed by an officer of a corporation.” The accuracy of the rule announced in State v. Griffith, supra, is debatable at the best (see 20 C.

11926–1926

Where else courts name it

MN 74 (1979–2026) OH 49 (1975–2024) NY 43 (1901–2023) CA 31 (1959–2025) IL 24 (1910–2023) IA 20 (1970–2024) MO 17 (1965–2023) FL 16 (1958–2018) WA 15 (1975–2024) NM 12 (1983–2019) NJ 10 (1975–2022) VA 9 (1967–2025) IN 9 (1900–2014) ND 9 (1981–2008) MS 9 (1988–2020) TN 9 (1949–2018) TX 8 (1983–2024) ID 8 (1991–2017) MD 8 (1986–2024) UT 7 (1980–2023) MA 7 (1974–2009) MI 7 (1977–2020) OR 7 (1979–2012) PA 6 (1955–2011) NE 6 (1907–2017) KS 5 (1926–2024) LA 5 (1984–1990) HI 5 (1999–2021) AZ 5 (1954–2016) VT 5 (1982–2023) GA 4 (1990–2012) DC 4 (2020–2023) KY 4 (1970–2008) NC 4 (1973–2022) AL 4 (1986–2003) WY 4 (2002–2007) WI 4 (1909–2022) MT 3 (2003–2008) OK 3 (1969–2004) WV 3 (1979–1988) CO 3 (1980–1990) RI 3 (1996–2005) DE 3 (1972–2017) SD 2 (1975–2002) CT 2 (1989–2001) ME 2 (2011–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check