accuracy rule in Nebraska

2017Morrow, a Class B permit holder, testi- fied that he personally observed Jasa for the entire 15-minute - 834 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JASA Cite as 297 Neb. 822 observation period and perceived nothing that would affect the accuracy of the test administered by Sears.

1992The concern is with the competence of the person withdrawing the blood rather than with an occupational label he may have been awarded by a private association”); State v. Carter, 202 Kan. 63 , 446 P.2d 759 (1968) (resident doctor who was a foreign medical school graduate was a “qualified medical technician”); State v. Bailey, 76 N.C.

1992The concern is with the competence of the person withdrawing the blood rather than with an occupational label he may have been awarded by a private association”); State v. Carter, 202 Kan. 63 , 446 P.2d 759 (1968) (resident doctor who was a foreign medical school graduate was a “qualified medical technician”); State v. Bailey, 76 N.C.

1992The concern is with the competence of the person withdrawing the blood rather than with an occupational label he may have been awarded by a private association”); State v. Carter, 202 Kan. 63 , 446 P.2d 759 (1968) (resident doctor who was a foreign medical school graduate was a “qualified medical technician”); State v. Bailey, 76 N.C.

1978Without, at this time, questioning the accuracy of the rule announced in T & N P Co., Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, supra, I specifically object to the majority’s partial overruling of J K & J, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 194 Neb. 413 , 231 N. W. 2d 694 .

1978Without, at this time, questioning the accuracy of the rule announced in T & N P Co., Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, supra, I specifically object to the majority’s partial overruling of J K & J, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 194 Neb. 413 , 231 N. W. 2d 694 .

1969A conviction on radar evidence where the accuracy test was based only on a drive through speedometer check was affirmed in Kucera v. State, 170 Neb. 368 , 102 N. W. 2d 635 .

1969A conviction on radar evidence where the accuracy test was based only on a drive through speedometer check was affirmed in Kucera v. State, 170 Neb. 368 , 102 N. W. 2d 635 .

1937In Grosvenor v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 102 Neb. 629 , 168 N. W. 596 , it was held: “The presumption against death by suicide is prima facie only and rebuttable.

1937In Grosvenor v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 102 Neb. 629 , 168 N. W. 596 , it was held: “The presumption against death by suicide is prima facie only and rebuttable.

1907We admit the accuracy of the rule, as announced in Cornfield v. Order Brith Abraham, 64 Minn. 261 : “It being admitted that the certificate of membership had been duly issued, the presumption would be that it continued in force.