exercise of home rule (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

exercise of home rule in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Claflin v. Walsh green
kan · 1973
2 sentences

1979In Clafiin v. Walsh, 212 Kan. 1, 7-8 , 509 P.2d 1130 (1973), we stated: “The optional powers of the legislature are set forth in Section 5 (b) as limitations or exceptions to the exercise of home rule power by cities.

1979In Clafiin v. Walsh, 212 Kan. 1, 7-8 , 509 P.2d 1130 (1973), we stated: “The optional powers of the legislature are set forth in Section 5 (b) as limitations or exceptions to the exercise of home rule power by cities.

21979–1982
Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. City of Newton green
kan · 1993
1 sentence

2015Executive Aircraft, 252 Kan. at 424 .

12015–2015
City of Wichita v. Kansas Taxpayers Network, Inc. green
kan · 1994
1 sentence

2007City of Wichita, 255 Kan. at 535 .

12007–2007
Todd v. Kelly green
kan · 1992
1 sentence

1994Todd v. Kelly , 251 Kan. 512 , 515 (1992).

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

IL 58 (1983–2026) FL 40 (1975–2026) KS 5 (1979–2015) OH 2 (2012–2020) PA 2 (2005–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check