Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Friess v. Quest Cherokee, L.L.C.green1 sentence2020See Friess v. Quest Cherokee, L.L.C., 42 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.green1 sentence2010Consistent with the weighing of factors discussed in Berst , the federal courts require the objecting party to meet the burden of showing “not only undue burden or expense, but that the burden or expense is unreasonable in light of the benefits to be secured from the discoveiy.” Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., 232 F.R.D. 377, 380 (D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Benally
green
2 sentences2019"In Prine II , 297 Kan. at 478 , 303 P.3d 662 , this court referred favorably to United States v. Benally , 500 F.3d 1085 , 1090-91 (10th Cir. 2007), which incorporated other tests into the weighing test for propensity evidence in sex crimes. 2019In State v. Prine , 297 Kan. 460 , 478, 303 P.3d 662 (2013), this court referred favorably to United States v. Benally , 500 F.3d 1085 , 1090-91 (10th Cir. 2007), which incorporated other tests into the weighing test for propensity evidence in sex crimes. | 3 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Prine
green
2 sentences2019"In Prine II , 297 Kan. at 478 , 303 P.3d 662 , this court referred favorably to United States v. Benally , 500 F.3d 1085 , 1090-91 (10th Cir. 2007), which incorporated other tests into the weighing test for propensity evidence in sex crimes. 2019In State v. Prine , 297 Kan. 460 , 478, 303 P.3d 662 (2013), this court referred favorably to United States v. Benally , 500 F.3d 1085 , 1090-91 (10th Cir. 2007), which incorporated other tests into the weighing test for propensity evidence in sex crimes. | 3 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.