Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kentucky opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stanford v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2026Washington, 34 S.W.3d at 379 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Stanford v. Commonwealth, 793 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Ky. 1990)). 2008Stanford v. Commonwealth, 793 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Ky.1990) (quoting Batson, supra, at 98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1724 .) Finally, the trial court has the duty to evaluate the credibility of the proffered reasons and determine if the defendant has established purposeful discrimination. | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2008Stanford v. Commonwealth, 793 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Ky.1990) (quoting Batson, supra, at 98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1724 .) Finally, the trial court has the duty to evaluate the credibility of the proffered reasons and determine if the defendant has established purposeful discrimination. 2008Stanford v. Commonwealth, 793 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Ky.1990) (quoting Batson, supra, at 98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1724 .) Finally, the trial court has the duty to evaluate the credibility of the proffered reasons and determine if the defendant has established purposeful discrimination. | 4 | 2000–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.