Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buckley
green
2 sentences2002State v. Buckley, 426 So.2d 103 (La.1983); State v. Zielman, 384 So.2d 359 (La.1980). 1985State v. Buckley, 426 So.2d 103 (La.1983); State v. Zielman, 384 So. 359 (La.1980). | 2 | 1985–2002 |
People v. Moorer
green
1 sentence2017The court held that the warrantless monitoring of a defendant's cell phone location revealed the same information as visual surveillance so there was no Fourth Amendment violation; People v. Moorer, 39 Misc. 3d 603 , 959 N.Y.S.2d 868 (NY County Court 2013) concluding that "by a person's voluntary utilization, through GPS technology, of a cell phone, a person necessarily .has no reasonable expectation of privacy with, respect to the phone's location—vis-a-vis the pinging—even though he maintains what may be a reasonable ex- , pectation of privacy in the content of his phone conversations.”) . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Devega v. State
green
2 sentences2017The agents "pinged” the phone along the way to locate it and arrested the defendant, The federal appeals court found that the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the GPS data and rejected his argument that the use of the,GPS location information emitted from his cell phone was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment; Devega v. State of Georgia, 286 Ga. 448 , 689 S.E.2d 293 (2010), where Georgia's highest • court rejected a cjaim by the defendant that his attorney was ineffective for failing to challenge the war-rantless "ping” of his cell phone as a 2017The agents "pinged” the phone along the way to locate it and arrested the defendant, The federal appeals court found that the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the GPS data and rejected his argument that the use of the,GPS location information emitted from his cell phone was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment; Devega v. State of Georgia, 286 Ga. 448 , 689 S.E.2d 293 (2010), where Georgia's highest • court rejected a cjaim by the defendant that his attorney was ineffective for failing to challenge the war-rantless "ping” of his cell phone as a | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences2005Evidence was seized pursuant to a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 5 of the Louisiana | flConstitution of 1974, and the warrant was facially and constitutionally defective pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). 2005Evidence was seized pursuant to a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 5 of the Louisiana | flConstitution of 1974, and the warrant was facially and constitutionally defective pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Zielman
green
1 sentence2002State v. Buckley, 426 So.2d 103 (La.1983); State v. Zielman, 384 So.2d 359 (La.1980). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Matlock
green
2 sentences1993United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974). 1993United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.