Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buterbaughgreen2 sentences2007State v. Buterbaugh, 138 Idaho 96, 99 , 57 P.3d 807, 810 (Ct.App.2002). 2007State v. Buterbaugh, 138 Idaho 96, 99 , 57 P.3d 807, 810 (Ct.App.2002). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Howard
green
2 sentences2023Relying on two recent Idaho Supreme Court cases, State v. Randall, 169 Idaho 358 , 496 P.3d 844 (2021), and State v. Howard, 169 Idaho 379 , 496 P.3d 865 (2021), cert. denied (Oct. 3, 2022) (No. 21-975), Ricks argued the drug dog’s entry into Ricks’ vehicle was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 2023Relying on two recent Idaho Supreme Court cases, State v. Randall, 169 Idaho 358 , 496 P.3d 844 (2021), and State v. Howard, 169 Idaho 379 , 496 P.3d 865 (2021), cert. denied (Oct. 3, 2022) (No. 21-975), Ricks argued the drug dog’s entry into Ricks’ vehicle was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Randall
green
2 sentences2023Relying on two recent Idaho Supreme Court cases, State v. Randall, 169 Idaho 358 , 496 P.3d 844 (2021), and State v. Howard, 169 Idaho 379 , 496 P.3d 865 (2021), cert. denied (Oct. 3, 2022) (No. 21-975), Ricks argued the drug dog’s entry into Ricks’ vehicle was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 2023Relying on two recent Idaho Supreme Court cases, State v. Randall, 169 Idaho 358 , 496 P.3d 844 (2021), and State v. Howard, 169 Idaho 379 , 496 P.3d 865 (2021), cert. denied (Oct. 3, 2022) (No. 21-975), Ricks argued the drug dog’s entry into Ricks’ vehicle was a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Islas
green
1 sentence2023Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Freddie Anthony Naranjo
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 259–60, 359 P.3d at 1056–57. 2021Id. at 259–60, 359 P.3d at 1056–57. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Chimel v. California
red
2 sentences1976The United States Supreme Court, in formulating this warrantless search exception, construed the phrase “ ‘within his immediate control’ * * * to mean the area from within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.” Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 763 , 89 S.Ct. 2034, 2040 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969). 1976The United States Supreme Court, in formulating this warrantless search exception, construed the phrase “ ‘within his immediate control’ * * * to mean the area from within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.” Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 763 , 89 S.Ct. 2034, 2040 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.