Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beachgreen1 sentence2002The proper measure of damages is “the value of the benefits that the plaintiff proves are actually received and retained by the defendant.” See A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 639 A.2d 103, 106 (Me. 1994). | 1 | 1 |
Hayford v. Wentworthgreen2 sentences1981The value of this rule is its bearing upon the question of intention — it is unlikely that the parties would have intended for the removal of additions where removal would materially damage the remaining estate. 4 Id. at 240 , 76 A. at 682 ; Hayford v. Wentworth, 97 Me. 347, 350-51 , 54 A. 940, 941 (1903). 1981The value of this rule is its bearing upon the question of intention — it is unlikely that the parties would have intended for the removal of additions where removal would materially damage the remaining estate. 4 Id. at 240 , 76 A. at 682 ; Hayford v. Wentworth, 97 Me. 347, 350-51 , 54 A. 940, 941 (1903). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sarah R. Bolduc v. Daniel J. Bolduc
green
2 sentences2025Bolduc v. Bolduc, 2023 ME 54, ¶ 8 , 301 A.3d 771 . 2025Bolduc v. Bolduc, 2023 ME 54, ¶ 8 , 301 A.3d 771 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Prutzman v. Armstrong
green
1 sentence2004It reasoned that “[a]ny other interpretation [of exhaustion] would furnish no incentive for plaintiffs to seek an adequate settlement from their own insurer because they could always force the [insurance guaranty association] to pay the difference between the settlement and the actual value of their claim.” Id. [¶ 12] We find the Washington Supreme Court’s reasoning persuasive. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
John P. Squire & Co. v. City of Portland
green
2 sentences1981The value of this rule is its bearing upon the question of intention — it is unlikely that the parties would have intended for the removal of additions where removal would materially damage the remaining estate. 4 Id. at 240 , 76 A. at 682 ; Hayford v. Wentworth, 97 Me. 347, 350-51 , 54 A. 940, 941 (1903). 1981The value of this rule is its bearing upon the question of intention — it is unlikely that the parties would have intended for the removal of additions where removal would materially damage the remaining estate. 4 Id. at 240 , 76 A. at 682 ; Hayford v. Wentworth, 97 Me. 347, 350-51 , 54 A. 940, 941 (1903). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Munsey
green
1 sentence1964State v. Munsey, supra. To permit under such circumstances the introduction of evidence which *130 might lead a jury to assume that the rspondent had refused to have the test might diminish if not destroy the value of his privilege of refusal. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.