Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Khourigreen2 sentences2025Under the Smith framework, a trial court begins its analysis by “determining the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services” based on “reliable surveys or other credible evidence of the legal market.” Smith, 481 Mich at 530-531 (quotation marks and citations omitted). 2023Under the Khouri framework, the trial court begins its analysis by “determining the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services” based on “reliable surveys or other credible evidence of the legal market.” Khouri, 481 Mich at 530-531 (quotation marks and citations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2015People v Rogers, 249 Mich App 77, 94 ; 641 NW2d 595 (2001). 2015People v Rogers, 249 Mich App 77, 94 ; 641 NW2d 595 (2001). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
green
2 sentences2004In Gulf Offshore Co v Mobil Oil Corp, 453 US 473, 478 ; 101 S Ct 2870 ; 69 L Ed 2d 784 (1981), the United States Supreme Court stated: In considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the Court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction. 2004In Gulf Offshore Co v Mobil Oil Corp, 453 US 473, 478 ; 101 S Ct 2870 ; 69 L Ed 2d 784 (1981), the United States Supreme Court stated: In considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the Court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.