Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.green2 sentences1990The United States Supreme Court has instructed us that “in considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction.” Id. at 478 , 101 S.Ct. at 2875 ; see also California v. Arizona, 440 U.S. 59, 66-67 , 99 S.Ct. 919, 923-24 , 59 L.Ed.2d 144 (1979). 1990The United States Supreme Court has instructed us that “in considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction.” Id. at 478 , 101 S.Ct. at 2875 ; see also California v. Arizona, 440 U.S. 59, 66-67 , 99 S.Ct. 919, 923-24 , 59 L.Ed.2d 144 (1979). | 1 | 2 |
Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson Countygreen1 sentence2025Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 150 (Tex. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's Londongreen1 sentence2015Id., citing Gilbert, 327 S.W.3d 118, 126 (Tex. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
In Re RRgreen1 sentence2014With respect to determining what is in a child’s best interest, a trial court begins its analysis with a “strong presumption that the best interest of a child is served by keeping the child with a parent.” In re R.R., 209 S.W.3d 112, 116 (Tex. 2006); see Tex. Fam. | 1 | 1 |
Lawrence v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See Lawrence v. State, 240 S.W.3d 912, 915 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Granvielgreen1 sentence2000Ex parte Granviel , 561 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Benavidesgreen1 sentence1999Ex parte Benavides, 801 S.W.2d 535, 537 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, writ dism’d w.o.j.). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Stategreen1 sentence1991Harris v. State, 790 S.W.2d 568, 584 (Tex.Cr.App.1989); Mallory v. State, 752 S.W.2d 566, 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Mallory v. Stategreen1 sentence1991Harris v. State, 790 S.W.2d 568, 584 (Tex.Cr.App.1989); Mallory v. State, 752 S.W.2d 566, 568 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
California v. Arizonagreen2 sentences1990The United States Supreme Court has instructed us that “in considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction.” Id. at 478 , 101 S.Ct. at 2875 ; see also California v. Arizona, 440 U.S. 59, 66-67 , 99 S.Ct. 919, 923-24 , 59 L.Ed.2d 144 (1979). 1990The United States Supreme Court has instructed us that “in considering the propriety of state-court jurisdiction over any particular federal claim, the court begins with the presumption that state courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction.” Id. at 478 , 101 S.Ct. at 2875 ; see also California v. Arizona, 440 U.S. 59, 66-67 , 99 S.Ct. 919, 923-24 , 59 L.Ed.2d 144 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Hillgreen1 sentence1978In passing upon the constitutionality of a statute, the court begins with a presumption of validity, Robinson v. Hill, 507 S.W.2d 521, 524 (Tex.1974), and, if possible, the statute must be construed to avoid repugnancy to the constitution. | 1 | 1 |
Key Western Life Insurance v. State Board of Insurancegreen2 sentences1978Key Western Life Insurance Company v. State Board of Insurance, 163 Tex. 11 , 350 S.W.2d 839, 849 (1961). 1978Key Western Life Insurance Company v. State Board of Insurance, 163 Tex. 11 , 350 S.W.2d 839, 849 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estes v. State
green
1 sentence2023Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
First Bank v. Brumitt
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 103 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Marina Mezitis Diorinou v. Nicholas H.E. Mezitis
green
1 sentence2018Diorinou v. Mezitis , 237 F.3d 133 , 145 (2d Cir. 2001). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Shafaii Children's Trust & Party & Reception Center, Inc. v. West American Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence2015Id., citing Gilbert, 327 S.W.3d 118, 126 (Tex. 2010). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Smith v. Davis
green
1 sentence1969As recently as 1968 the Supreme Court, in Smith v. Davis, 426 S.W.2d 827 , pointed out that in passing on the constitutionality of a statute, the court begins with the presumption of validity and presumes that the Legislature has not acted unreasonably or arbitrarily; and therefore a mere difference of opinion, where reasonable minds could differ, is not a sufficient basis for striking down legislation as arbitrary or unreasonable. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.