Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hardy; People v. Glenn
green
2 sentences2017Appellate review of a sentence following a juvenile sentencing hearing under MCL 769.25 is three-fold: the trial court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error; any questions of law are reviewed de novo, “and the court’s ultimate determination as to the sentence imposed” is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Hyatt, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 25, citing People v Hardy, 494 Mich 430, 438 ; 835 NW2d 340 (2013). 2017Appellate review of a sentence following a juvenile sentencing hearing under MCL 769.25 is three-fold: the trial court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error; any questions of law are reviewed de novo, “and the court’s ultimate determination as to the sentence imposed” is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Hyatt, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 25, citing People v Hardy, 494 Mich 430, 438 ; 835 NW2d 340 (2013). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Milbourn
red
2 sentences2017A court abuses its discretion when it imposes a sentence that “violates the principle of proportionality, which requires sentences . . . to be proportionate to the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the offense and the offender.” People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636 ; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). 2 As the trial court recognized, certain aggravating circumstances existed in this case that warranted a harsh sentence. 2017A court abuses its discretion when it imposes a sentence that “violates the principle of proportionality, which requires sentences . . . to be proportionate to the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the offense and the offender.” People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636 ; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). 2 As the trial court recognized, certain aggravating circumstances existed in this case that warranted a harsh sentence. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Passeno
red
2 sentences1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). 1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). | 2 | 1994–1996 |
People v. Parrish
green
2 sentences2000People v Parrish, 216 Mich App 178 ; 549 NW2d 32 (1996). 2000People v Parrish, 216 Mich App 178 ; 549 NW2d 32 (1996). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Lyons
green
2 sentences1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). 1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Hazzard
neutral
2 sentences1996Hazzard, supra, p 661 . 1996Hazzard, supra, p. 661 , 522 N.W.2d 910 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Brown
green
2 sentences1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). 1996People v Brown, 205 Mich App 503, 504-505 ; 517 NW2d 806 (1994); People v Lyons (On Remand), 203 Mich App 465, 468 ; 513 NW2d 170 (1994); People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91, 104-105 ; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.