plaintiff may bring claim (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

plaintiff may bring claim in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Warth v. Seldin red
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

2007Warth simply does not stand for the proposition that a plaintiff may bring a claim asserting the general public interest where the plaintiff lacks constitutional standing to bring that claim himself.50 Warth plainly stated that 49 Post at 6, quoting Warth, 422 US at 501 . 50 Justice Kelly’s position would, in fact, create a significant loophole in standing doctrine.

2007Warth simply does not stand for the proposition that a plaintiff may bring a claim asserting the general public interest where the plaintiff lacks constitutional standing to bring that claim himself.50 Warth plainly stated that 49 Post at 6, quoting Warth, 422 US at 501 . 50 Justice Kelly’s position would, in fact, create a significant loophole in standing doctrine.

22007–2007
Kachudas v. Invaders Self Auto Wash, Inc. green
mich · 2010
2 sentences

2022Kachudas v Invaders Self Auto Wash, Inc, 486 Mich 913, 914 ; 781 NW2d 806 (2010).

2022Kachudas v Invaders Self Auto Wash, Inc, 486 Mich 913, 914 ; 781 NW2d 806 (2010).

12022–2022
Barnard v. Dilley green
michctapp · 1984
1 sentence

2018The trial court reasoned: Here, Plaintiffs' complaint is not alleging that the Defendant failed to perform a specific task such as the promise to watch an employee as in *549 Banker[ & Brisebois Co. v. Maddox , unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 29, 2014 (Docket No. 310993) [ 2014 WL 1720285 ].] As reflected in Barnard , 350 NW2d 887 (1984) and Aldred [ v. O'Hara-Bruce , 184 Mich. App. 488 , 458 N.W.2d 671 (1990) ], Plaintiffs [ ' ] claim here is in essence an allegation that the Defendant's accounting services were inadequate.

12018–2018
Aldred v. O'Hara-Bruce green
michctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2018The trial court reasoned: Here, Plaintiffs' complaint is not alleging that the Defendant failed to perform a specific task such as the promise to watch an employee as in *549 Banker[ & Brisebois Co. v. Maddox , unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 29, 2014 (Docket No. 310993) [ 2014 WL 1720285 ].] As reflected in Barnard , 350 NW2d 887 (1984) and Aldred [ v. O'Hara-Bruce , 184 Mich. App. 488 , 458 N.W.2d 671 (1990) ], Plaintiffs [ ' ] claim here is in essence an allegation that the Defendant's accounting services were inadequate.

2018The trial court reasoned: Here, Plaintiffs' complaint is not alleging that the Defendant failed to perform a specific task such as the promise to watch an employee as in *549 Banker[ & Brisebois Co. v. Maddox , unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued April 29, 2014 (Docket No. 310993) [ 2014 WL 1720285 ].] As reflected in Barnard , 350 NW2d 887 (1984) and Aldred [ v. O'Hara-Bruce , 184 Mich. App. 488 , 458 N.W.2d 671 (1990) ], Plaintiffs [ ' ] claim here is in essence an allegation that the Defendant's accounting services were inadequate.

12018–2018
Frank v. Linkner green
michctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2017Id. at 183-186 .

12017–2017

Where else courts name it

IN 7 (2000–2018) IL 6 (2006–2019) MI 5 (2007–2022) CA 5 (1998–2025) WA 4 (2007–2014) CT 3 (1998–2000) OH 3 (2005–2009) TX 2 (2007–2007) NC 2 (2022–2022) MN 2 (2001–2023) SD 2 (2006–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check