Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cyrus v. Nerogreen2 sentences2011See Cyrus, 546 N.E.2d at 331 . 2000See Cyrus, 546 N.E.2d at 331 . | 2 | 2 |
C & E CORP. v. Ramco Industries, Inc.green1 sentence2002This does not mean, however, that the plaintiff may sit idly by if he discovers facts that alert him that he has a cause of action. "[The doctrine of continuing wrong will not prevent the statute of limitations from beginning to run when the plaintiff learns of facts which should lead to the discovery of his cause of action even if his relationship with the tortfeasor continues beyond that point." C & E Corp. v. Ramco Indus., Inc., 717 N.E.2d 642, 645 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018“When this doctrine attaches, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the wrongful act ceases, and at that point the plaintiff may bring the claim within the normal statutory period.” Id. [16] Here, however, the act that produced the alleged injury—the abandonment of the foreign object—was an isolated event, not part of an entire course of conduct. 2002"When this doctrine attaches, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the wrongful act ceases, and at that point the plaintiff may bring the claim within the normal statutory period." Id. at 699 . | 5 | 2002–2026 |
Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
green
1 sentence2016At the same time, however, the Court observed: “The plaintiff bringing such an action, however, must be prepared to show that the defendant inter,-ferer acted intentionally and without a legitimate, business .purpose.” Id. at 285 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.