recovery claim (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

recovery claim in Minnesota

5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1943–1993 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolisgreen
minn · 1914 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1943–1943
2 sentences

1943See County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , 516 , 148 N.W. 469 , 470 .

1943See County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , 516 , 148 N.W. 469 , 470 .

22
Dolgow v. Andersongreen
nyed · 1968 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
1 sentence

1987The purpose of the class action has been to take “care of the smaller guy.” Dolgow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 485 (E.D.N.Y.1968).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Share Health Plan, Inc. v. Marcotte green
minnctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1993Although the controlling effect of the qualifying language in Westendorf has been questioned, see Marcotte, 495 N.W.2d at 5 , we are reluctant to characterize such a distinct expression of law as superfluous.

11993–1993
Allum v. MedCenter Health Care, Inc. green
minnctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1993He relies heavily on Allum v. MedCenter Health Care, Inc., 371 N.W.2d 557 (Minn.App.1985) as affirming the inviolability of the general rule.

11993–1993
Cooper v. Younkin green
minn · 1983
2 sentences

1992While Cooper v. Younkin, 339 N.W.2d 552 (Minn.1983) involves a workers’ compensation subrogation claim and contains a discussion of the equitable doctrine of full recovery, I am not certain that Cooper is controlling on that issue.

1992While Cooper v. Younkin, 339 N.W.2d 552 (Minn.1983) involves a workers' compensation subrogation claim and contains a discussion of the equitable doctrine of full recovery, I am not certain that Cooper is controlling on that issue.

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

TX 47 (1895–2023) IL 33 (1883–2025) MO 21 (1853–2023) CA 15 (1865–2026) NY 15 (1860–2017) GA 12 (1906–2019) OH 9 (1892–2003) IN 8 (1900–2001) CT 7 (1912–2006) IA 7 (1881–1994) AL 7 (1989–2012) ND 7 (1968–2015) KY 7 (1874–1959) NJ 6 (1983–2020) NE 6 (1894–2004) PA 6 (1884–1988) WA 6 (1912–2008) TN 5 (1921–2006) VA 5 (1994–2026) KS 5 (1901–2010) MN 5 (1943–1993) AZ 5 (1954–2016) WV 4 (1904–1962) OR 3 (1933–2006) DE 3 (2006–2023) NM 3 (1950–2006) MI 3 (1938–2015) FL 3 (1919–1984) LA 3 (1939–1991) UT 2 (1908–1988) NC 2 (1896–2026) MS 2 (1996–1998) VT 2 (1923–1935) WY 2 (1984–1989) AR 2 (1971–1994) MD 2 (1993–2006) MA 2 (1959–2002) SD 2 (1943–1992) AK 2 (1983–1992) SC 2 (1976–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check