Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences2016The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution forbids a prosecutor from challenging potential jurors “solely on account of their race.” Batson, 476 U.S. at 89 , 106 S. Ct. at 1719 . 3 To make a successful Batson challenge, the defendant must first make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race, the burden then shifts to the state to articulate a race-neutral explanation, [and] then the district court must determine whether the defendant met his burden of proving intentional discrimination. 2016The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution forbids a prosecutor from challenging potential jurors “solely on account of their race.” Batson, 476 U.S. at 89 , 106 S. Ct. at 1719 . 3 To make a successful Batson challenge, the defendant must first make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race, the burden then shifts to the state to articulate a race-neutral explanation, [and] then the district court must determine whether the defendant met his burden of proving intentional discrimination. | 1 | 3 |
Hernandez v. New Yorkgreen2 sentences2000See Flournoy v. State, 583 N.W.2d 564, 570 (Minn.1998); see also Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 *222 S.Ct. 1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991). 2000See Flournoy v. State, 583 N.W.2d 564, 570 (Minn.1998); see also Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 *222 S.Ct. 1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991). | 1 | 2 |
State v. McDonoughgreen1 sentence2016State v. McDonough, 631 N.W.2d 373, 385 (Minn. 2001); see Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-98 , 106 S. Ct. at 1723-24 ; see also Minn. R. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martingreen2 sentences2001State v. Martin, 614 N.W.2d 214, 221 (Minn.2000) (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 98, 106 S.Ct. 1712 ). 2001State v. Martin, 614 N.W.2d 214, 221 (Minn. 2000) (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 98, 106 S.Ct. 1712 ). | 1 | 1 |
Flournoy v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Flournoy v. State, 583 N.W.2d 564, 570 (Minn.1998); see also Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 *222 S.Ct. 1859, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gaitangreen1 sentence1998State v. Gaitan, 536 N.W.2d 11, 15 (Minn.1995) (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.