Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lawrencegreen2 sentences2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. 2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 2 | 4 |
State v. Kandiesgreen2 sentences2020HOOD Opinion of the Court Defendant next contends that the State exercised a peremptory challenge against an African-American prospective juror for a racially discriminatory purpose, violating “the juror’s constitutional right to serve on a jury and Defendant’s constitutional rights to equal protection, due process and a jury of his peers.” A. Standard of Review Upon review of a Batson inquiry, “[t]he findings of a trial court are not to be overturned unless the appellate court is convinced that its determination was clearly erroneous.” State v. Kandies, 342 N.C. 419, 434-35 , 467 S.E.2d 67, 7 2020HOOD Opinion of the Court Defendant next contends that the State exercised a peremptory challenge against an African-American prospective juror for a racially discriminatory purpose, violating “the juror’s constitutional right to serve on a jury and Defendant’s constitutional rights to equal protection, due process and a jury of his peers.” A. Standard of Review Upon review of a Batson inquiry, “[t]he findings of a trial court are not to be overturned unless the appellate court is convinced that its determination was clearly erroneous.” State v. Kandies, 342 N.C. 419, 434-35 , 467 S.E.2d 67, 7 | 2 | 2 |
Johnson v. Californiagreen2 sentences2020“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race.” Fair, 354 N.C. at 140 , 557 S.E.2d at 509 . “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial [court] to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410, 2417 (2005). 2020“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race.” Fair, 354 N.C. at 140 , 557 S.E.2d at 509 . “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial [court] to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410, 2417 (2005). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Fairgreen2 sentences2020“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race.” Fair, 354 N.C. at 140 , 557 S.E.2d at 509 . “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial [court] to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410, 2417 (2005). 2020“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race.” Fair, 354 N.C. at 140 , 557 S.E.2d at 509 . “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial [court] to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 , 125 S. Ct. 2410, 2417 (2005). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Whitegreen2 sentences2018This showing is "based on all relevant circumstances, such as defendant's race, the victim's race, the race of key witnesses, questions and statements of the prosecutor which tend to support or refute an inference of discrimination, a pattern of strikes against minorities, or the State's acceptance rate of prospective minority jurors." State v. White , 349 N.C. 535 , 548, 508 S.E.2d 253 , 262 (1998) (citation omitted). 2018This showing is "based on all relevant circumstances, such as defendant's race, the victim's race, the race of key witnesses, questions and statements of the prosecutor which tend to support or refute an inference of discrimination, a pattern of strikes against minorities, or the State's acceptance rate of prospective minority jurors." State v. White , 349 N.C. 535 , 548, 508 S.E.2d 253 , 262 (1998) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2025The State exercised a peremptory challenge as to Eric M, a Black man, and Defendant objected to this challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). 2025The State exercised a peremptory challenge as to Eric M, a Black man, and Defendant objected to this challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). | 2 | 2004–2025 |
Cielto v. United States
green
2 sentences2020HOOD Opinion of the Court Defendant next contends that the State exercised a peremptory challenge against an African-American prospective juror for a racially discriminatory purpose, violating “the juror’s constitutional right to serve on a jury and Defendant’s constitutional rights to equal protection, due process and a jury of his peers.” A. Standard of Review Upon review of a Batson inquiry, “[t]he findings of a trial court are not to be overturned unless the appellate court is convinced that its determination was clearly erroneous.” State v. Kandies, 342 N.C. 419, 434-35 , 467 S.E.2d 67, 7 2020HOOD Opinion of the Court Defendant next contends that the State exercised a peremptory challenge against an African-American prospective juror for a racially discriminatory purpose, violating “the juror’s constitutional right to serve on a jury and Defendant’s constitutional rights to equal protection, due process and a jury of his peers.” A. Standard of Review Upon review of a Batson inquiry, “[t]he findings of a trial court are not to be overturned unless the appellate court is convinced that its determination was clearly erroneous.” State v. Kandies, 342 N.C. 419, 434-35 , 467 S.E.2d 67, 7 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Falge v. Apfel
green
1 sentence2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lawrence v. Turpin
green
1 sentence2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Young v. Hanks
green
1 sentence2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hernandez v. New York
green
2 sentences2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. 2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Bonnett
green
2 sentences2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. 2018Three-Prong Batson Test "In Batson the United States Supreme Court set out a three-pronged test to determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their race." State v. Bonnett , 348 N.C. 417 , 433, 502 S.E.2d 563 , 574 (1998) (citing Hernandez v. New York , 500 U.S. 352 , 358-59, 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 114 L.Ed. 2d 395 , 405 (1991) ), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1124 , 119 S.Ct. 909 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 907 (1999). *786 "First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a peremptory challenge on the basis of race." State v. Fair , 354 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.