Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1963–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Torixgreen1 sentence2005In re Marriage of Torix, 863 S.W.2d 935, 941 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Riggsgreen1 sentence2003See State v. Riggs, 2 S.W.3d 867, 873 (Mo.App.1999)(making a comparable analysis under Section 568.045.1 RSMo (2000), the crime of endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree, under which a defendant must act “knowingly.”) “Substantial” is defined as “not seeming or *233 imaginary: not illusive”. | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Younggreen2 sentences1963State Highway Commission v. Young, 324 Mo. 277 , 23 S.W.2d 130, 134 [8], as follows: “Respondent’s instruction No. 1 is further assailed on the ground that it erroneously defines ‘special benefits’ to be those which are unique and enjoyed by the respondent’s farm alone. 1963State Highway Commission v. Young, 324 Mo. 277 , 23 S.W.2d 130, 134 [8], as follows: “Respondent’s instruction No. 1 is further assailed on the ground that it erroneously defines ‘special benefits’ to be those which are unique and enjoyed by the respondent’s farm alone. | 1 | 1 |
Filger v. State Highway Commission of Missourigreen1 sentence1963But diminution in value of the property, resulting from the interference, is a special and peculiar injury within the rule.” A similarity in principle between the ascertainment of damages and benefits in condemnation cases is indicated by Filger v. State Highway Commission, Mo.App., 355 S.W.2d 425, 428 [1], wherein it is stated that: “Traffic, great or small, is merely an incident of streets and highways and cannot be considered either as an element of damages or benefits.” A landowner’s complaint about a comparable instruction dealing with special benefits was stated and disposed of in State | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haymart v. Freiberger
green
1 sentence1979It should be noted that in 1972 a comparable error was made by the County Superintendent of Schools with respect to reassignments from this same school area, as pointed out in Hay-mart v. Freiberger, supra. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
green
1 sentence1968Criminal Law § 1145(3), p. 379, it is stated, “The trial.court in a criminal prosecution has the power to direct a verdict on the opening statement of prosecuting counsel; but this power should be exercised only when it clearly and affirmatively appears from the statement that the charge against accused cannot be sustained under any view of the evidence consistent with it, and only when the opportunity to correct or embellish the statement has been given to the prosecutor subsequent to accused’s motion to direct a verdict.” See the comparable rule in civil cases, Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railr | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty Company
green
1 sentence1968State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Fenix, Mo. App., 311 S.W.2d 61 ; and Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty Company, Mo., 359 S.W.2d 748 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Fenix
green
1 sentence1968State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Fenix, Mo. App., 311 S.W.2d 61 ; and Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty Company, Mo., 359 S.W.2d 748 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.