Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Austingreen2 sentences2002See State v. Austin, 285 N.C. 364, 367 , 204 S.E.2d 675, 677 (1974). 2002See State v. Austin, 285 N.C. 364, 367 , 204 S.E.2d 675, 677 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Erlewinegreen2 sentences1994See Erlewine, 328 N.C. at 635-36 , 403 S.E.2d at 285 . 1994See Erlewine, 328 N.C. at 635-36 , 403 S.E.2d at 285 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Canady
green
2 sentences2016Cf. State v. Canady , 355 N.C. 242 , 249, 559 S.E.2d 762 , 766 (2002) (holding that officer's testimony received to explain his subsequent actions was inadmissible hearsay where it went "so far beyond the confines of the instruction" and the State relied on it "as substantive evidence of the details of the murders and to imply defendant had given a detailed confession of his alleged crimes"). 2016Cf. State v. Canady , 355 N.C. 242 , 249, 559 S.E.2d 762 , 766 (2002) (holding that officer's testimony received to explain his subsequent actions was inadmissible hearsay where it went "so far beyond the confines of the instruction" and the State relied on it "as substantive evidence of the details of the murders and to imply defendant had given a detailed confession of his alleged crimes"). | 3 | 2009–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.