Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1955–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ripley v. Goddengreen2 sentences1960(Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 355.) * * * but is satisfied by a proceed *29 ing applicable to the subject-matter and conformable to such general rules as affect all persons alike.” In Reed v. Reed, 70 Neb. 779 , 98 N. W. 73 , it is said: “Due process of law may be said to be satisfied whenever an opportunity is offered to invoke the equal protection of the law by judicial proceedings appropriate for the purpose and adequate to secure the end and object sought to be attained.” In Ripley v. Godden, 158 Neb. 246 , 63 N. W. 2d 151 , this court said: “The indispensable elements of due proces 1960(Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 355.) * * * but is satisfied by a proceed *29 ing applicable to the subject-matter and conformable to such general rules as affect all persons alike.” In Reed v. Reed, 70 Neb. 779 , 98 N. W. 73 , it is said: “Due process of law may be said to be satisfied whenever an opportunity is offered to invoke the equal protection of the law by judicial proceedings appropriate for the purpose and adequate to secure the end and object sought to be attained.” In Ripley v. Godden, 158 Neb. 246 , 63 N. W. 2d 151 , this court said: “The indispensable elements of due proces | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bockbrader v. Department of Public Institutions
green
2 sentences1993Bockbrader v. Department of Insts., 220 Neb. 17 , 367 N.W.2d 721 (1985). 1993Bockbrader v. Department of Insts., 220 Neb. 17 , 367 N.W.2d 721 (1985). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Levos v. Columbus Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences1985In re Appeal of Levos, 214 Neb. 507 , 335 N.W.2d 262 (1983). 1985In re Appeal of Levos, 214 Neb. 507 , 335 N.W.2d 262 (1983). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Reed v. Reed
neutral
2 sentences1960(Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 355.) * * * but is satisfied by a proceed *29 ing applicable to the subject-matter and conformable to such general rules as affect all persons alike.” In Reed v. Reed, 70 Neb. 779 , 98 N. W. 73 , it is said: “Due process of law may be said to be satisfied whenever an opportunity is offered to invoke the equal protection of the law by judicial proceedings appropriate for the purpose and adequate to secure the end and object sought to be attained.” In Ripley v. Godden, 158 Neb. 246 , 63 N. W. 2d 151 , this court said: “The indispensable elements of due proces 1960(Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 355.) * * * but is satisfied by a proceed *29 ing applicable to the subject-matter and conformable to such general rules as affect all persons alike.” In Reed v. Reed, 70 Neb. 779 , 98 N. W. 73 , it is said: “Due process of law may be said to be satisfied whenever an opportunity is offered to invoke the equal protection of the law by judicial proceedings appropriate for the purpose and adequate to secure the end and object sought to be attained.” In Ripley v. Godden, 158 Neb. 246 , 63 N. W. 2d 151 , this court said: “The indispensable elements of due proces | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Searle v. Yensen
green
1 sentence1956City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Searle v. Yensen, 118 Neb. 835 .” See, also, Watkins v. Dodson, supra. As stated in Watkins v. Dodson, supra: “The indispensable elements of due process are a tribunal with jurisdiction, notice of hearing to the proper party, and an opportunity for a fair hearing according to applicable procedures. * * * The law must require notice and give a right and an opportunity to be heard.” Since section 79-420, R. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
City of Wahoo v. Dickinson
neutral
1 sentence1956City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Searle v. Yensen, 118 Neb. 835 .” See, also, Watkins v. Dodson, supra. As stated in Watkins v. Dodson, supra: “The indispensable elements of due process are a tribunal with jurisdiction, notice of hearing to the proper party, and an opportunity for a fair hearing according to applicable procedures. * * * The law must require notice and give a right and an opportunity to be heard.” Since section 79-420, R. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Winkler v. City of Hastings
neutral
1 sentence1956City of Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Neb. 426 ; Winkler v. City of Hastings, 85 Neb. 212 ; Searle v. Yensen, 118 Neb. 835 .” See, also, Watkins v. Dodson, supra. As stated in Watkins v. Dodson, supra: “The indispensable elements of due process are a tribunal with jurisdiction, notice of hearing to the proper party, and an opportunity for a fair hearing according to applicable procedures. * * * The law must require notice and give a right and an opportunity to be heard.” Since section 79-420, R. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.