Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Art Hill, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Developmentgreen2 sentences2020We held “that a party to an unemployment hearing may voluntarily waive the opportunity for a fair hearing where the party received actual notice of the hearing and failed to appear at or participate in the hearing.” Id. at 368 . [15] Like the employer in Art Hill, the County received actual notice of the telephonic hearing. 2019Bd. of Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 898 N.E.2d 363, 368 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (noting the employer provided a telephone extension to the administrative law judge’s office two days before the hearing but failed to notify it that its contact telephone number changed prior to the hearing and holding that a party to an unemployment hearing may voluntarily waive the opportunity for a fair hearing where the party received actual notice of the hearing and failed to appear at or participate in the hearing and that the employer was not denied a reasonable opportunity for a fair hearing or due process). | 6 | 13 |
Atkinson v. City of Mariongreen2 sentences2017“The tenure given a police officer ‘is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.’” Sullivan v. City of Evansville, 728 N.E.2d 182, 187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (quoting Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000)). 2014“The tenure given a police officer ‘is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.’” Sullivan v. City of Evansville, 728 N.E.2d 182, 187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (quoting Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). | 4 | 4 |
Dell v. City of Tiptongreen2 sentences2009"The tenure given a police officer 'is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body."" Sullivan, 728 N.E.2d at 187 (quoting Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind.Ct.App.1980) and citing Dell v. City of Tipton, 618 N.E.2d 1338, 1342 (Ind.Ct.App.1993), trans. denied (referring to Ind.Code section 36-8-3-4, which outlines police disciplinary hearing and appeal procedures)). 2000Commission’s Authority to Discipline Sullivan The tenure given a police officer “is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.” Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind.Ct.App.1980); see also Dell v. City of Tipton, 618 N.E.2d 1338, 1342 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (referring to Ind.Code § 36-8-3-4, which outlines police disciplinary hearing and appeal procedures). | 3 | 3 |
Sullivan v. City of Evansvillegreen2 sentences2017“The tenure given a police officer ‘is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.’” Sullivan v. City of Evansville, 728 N.E.2d 182, 187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (quoting Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000)). 2014“The tenure given a police officer ‘is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.’” Sullivan v. City of Evansville, 728 N.E.2d 182, 187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (quoting Atkinson v. City of Marion, 411 N.E.2d 622, 628 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980). | 2 | 3 |
Wolf Lake Pub, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Developmentgreen2 sentences2012Still, it has been held that “‘a party to an unemployment hearing may voluntarily waive the opportunity for a fair hearing where the party received actual notice of the hearing and failed to appear at or participate in the hearing.’” Id. (quoting Art Hill, Inc., v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 898 N.E.2d 363, 367 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008)). 2012See Wolf Lake Pub, Inc. v. Review Bd. of Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 930 N.E.2d 1138, 1142 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (concluding that the appellant was not denied a reasonable opportunity to participate in a fair hearing where the appellant had actual notice of the telephonic hearing but chose to go on vacation without ensuring access to a telephone during the time of the scheduled telephonic hearing); Art Hill, Inc. v. Review Bd. of Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 898 N.E.2d 363, 367-368 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (noting that a party to an unemployment hearing may voluntarily waive the opportunity for | 2 | 3 |
Fornelli v. City of Knoxgreen1 sentence2023We recognize that “[t]he Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 22A-MI-246| June 28, 2023 Page 19 of 25 tenure given a police officer ‘is a constitutionally protected interest requiring the opportunity for a fair hearing conducted in good faith before a full and impartial body.” Fornelli v. City of Knox, 902 N.E.2d 889, 893 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (cleaned up), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Failure to Satisfy Costs in Lawyer Disciplinary Cases of Cole
green
1 sentence2019In Lush, the claimant provided a telephone number to a union hall, the union hall operator was unable to locate the claimant, and the claimant indicated that he was present at the union hall but was told that he had not received a call from the administrative law judge. 944 N.E.2d at 496 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
McCallip v. State
green
1 sentence2018McCallip v. State, 580 N.E.2d 278 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991). [24] Soto claims the restitution order was unfair because the State did not present any evidence at sentencing to support its request for restitution. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
S.S. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
green
1 sentence2013See Art Hill v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 898 N.E.2d 363 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (party who received notice but provided wrong contact number was not denied reasonable opportunity for a fair hearing); S.S. v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 941 N.E.2d 550 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (party was not denied a reasonable opportunity to participate in hearing; even though she received notice and provided a phone number, she did not answer because she was confused about time zones). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
City of Indianapolis v. Nickel
green
1 sentence2012“Among [the] elements [of due process] are reasonable notice, an opportunity for a fair hearing, and the right to have a court of competent jurisdiction determine if the finding is supported by evidence.” Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
McKEE v. HASLER
neutral
1 sentence1986McKee v. Hasler (1951), 229 Ind. 487 , 98 N.E.2d 657, 668 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. City of Indianapolis
green
1 sentence1986McKee v. Hasler (1951), 229 Ind. 487 , 98 N.E.2d 657, 668 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
City of Mishawaka v. Stewart
green
2 sentences1980City of Mishawaka v. Stewart, (1974) 261 Ind. 670 , 310 N.E.2d 65 ; City of Hammond v. State ex rel. 1980City of Mishawaka v. Stewart, (1974) 261 Ind. 670 , 310 N.E.2d 65 ; City of Hammond v. State ex rel. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.
green
2 sentences1951Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N. E. 2d 399 ; Town of Walkerton v. N. Y. 1951Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N. E. 2d 399 ; Town of Walkerton v. N. Y. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.