5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of AGGgreen2 sentences2010See, In re Interest of A.G.G., 230 Neb. 707 , 433 N.W.2d 185 (1988); In re Interest of Jessica J. & Jennifer C., 9 Neb.App. 521 , 615 N.W.2d 119 (2000). 2010See, In re Interest of A.G.G., 230 Neb. 707 , 433 N.W.2d 185 (1988); In re Interest of Jessica J. & Jennifer C., 9 Neb.App. 521 , 615 N.W.2d 119 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Interest of LVgreen2 sentences2001However, the Nebraska Supreme Court has held that a parent need not be physically present at a termination of parental rights hearing so long as “a parent has been afforded procedural due process for a hearing to terminate parental rights,” In re Interest of L.V., 240 Neb. 404, 416 , 482 N.W.2d 250, 258 (1992), bearing in mind that the “concept of due process embodies the notion of fundamental fairness and defies precise definition.” Id. at 413 , 482 N.W.2d at 256-57 . 2001However, the Nebraska Supreme Court has held that a parent need not be physically present at a termination of parental rights hearing so long as “a parent has been afforded procedural due process for a hearing to terminate parental rights,” In re Interest of L.V., 240 Neb. 404, 416 , 482 N.W.2d 250, 258 (1992), bearing in mind that the “concept of due process embodies the notion of fundamental fairness and defies precise definition.” Id. at 413 , 482 N.W.2d at 256-57 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of Azia B.
green
1 sentence2016App. 124 , 626 N.W.2d 602 (2001), an incarcerated mother was represented by counsel at a termination-of-parental-rights hearing. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014In a termination of parental rights hearing, where the rules of evidence do not apply, neither do the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S. Ct. 2786 , 125 L. 2014In a termination of parental rights hearing, where the rules of evidence do not apply, neither do the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S. Ct. 2786 , 125 L. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Schafersman v. Agland Coop.
green
2 sentences2014Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and Schafersman v. Agland Coop, 262 Neb. 215 , 631 N.W.2d 862 (2001). 11. 2014Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and Schafersman v. Agland Coop, 262 Neb. 215 , 631 N.W.2d 862 (2001). 11. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re Interest of Jessica J.
green
2 sentences2010See, In re Interest of A.G.G., 230 Neb. 707 , 433 N.W.2d 185 (1988); In re Interest of Jessica J. & Jennifer C., 9 Neb.App. 521 , 615 N.W.2d 119 (2000). 2010See, In re Interest of A.G.G., 230 Neb. 707 , 433 N.W.2d 185 (1988); In re Interest of Jessica J. & Jennifer C., 9 Neb.App. 521 , 615 N.W.2d 119 (2000). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Stein v. New York
red
2 sentences1987(Citing Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156 , 73 S.Ct. 1077 , 97 L.Ed. 1522 (1953) "(hearsay evidence rule, with all its subtleties, anomalies, and ramifications, will not be read into the fourteenth amendment)." 715 P.2d at 1174 .) A termination of parental rights hearing is the culmination of months and sometimes years of juvenile court involvement with the parties. 1987(Citing Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156 , 73 S.Ct. 1077 , 97 L.Ed. 1522 (1953) "(hearsay evidence rule, with all its subtleties, anomalies, and ramifications, will not be read into the fourteenth amendment)." 715 P.2d at 1174 .) A termination of parental rights hearing is the culmination of months and sometimes years of juvenile court involvement with the parties. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Matter of JRB
green
2 sentences1987Ed. 1522 (1953) “(hearsay evidence rule, with all its subtleties, anomalies, and ramifications, will not be read into the fourteenth amendment).” 715 P.2d at 1174 .) A termination of parental rights hearing is the culmination of months and sometimes years of juvenile court involvement with the parties. 1987(Citing Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156 , 73 S.Ct. 1077 , 97 L.Ed. 1522 (1953) "(hearsay evidence rule, with all its subtleties, anomalies, and ramifications, will not be read into the fourteenth amendment)." 715 P.2d at 1174 .) A termination of parental rights hearing is the culmination of months and sometimes years of juvenile court involvement with the parties. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.