termination of parental rights hearing (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

termination of parental rights hearing in Arkansas

9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
McNutt v. Yatesgreen
ark · 2013 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See McNutt v. Yates , 2013 Ark. 427 , at 6, 430 S.W.3d 91 , 96 ; Anderson v. Douglas , 310 Ark. 633 , 839 S.W.2d 196 (1992).

2019See McNutt v. Yates , 2013 Ark. 427 , at 6, 430 S.W.3d 91 , 96 ; Anderson v. Douglas , 310 Ark. 633 , 839 S.W.2d 196 (1992).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Aguilera v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
arkctapp · 2013
2 sentences

2013Code Ann. § 9 - 27-341(d)(2) previously required the court to take judicial notice and incorporate by reference into the record all pleadings and testimony in the case incurred before the termination-of-parental-rights hearing, if the parent was represented by counsel. 6 Cite as 2013 Ark.

2013Code Ann. § 9 - 27-341(d)(2) previously required the court to take judicial notice and incorporate by reference into the record all pleadings and testimony in the case incurred before the termination-of-parental-rights hearing, if the parent was represented by counsel. 6 Cite as 2013 Ark.

22013–2013
Arnold v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
arkctapp · 2019
1 sentence

2024App. 300 , 578 S.W.3d 329 . 10 In addition to his failure to utilize services, Carter tested positive for amphetamines, methamphetamine, and THC throughout the case, including the test immediately prior to the termination-of-parental-rights hearing where he tested positive for methamphetamine and THC.

12024–2024
Anderson v. Douglas green
ark · 1992
2 sentences

2019See McNutt v. Yates , 2013 Ark. 427 , at 6, 430 S.W.3d 91 , 96 ; Anderson v. Douglas , 310 Ark. 633 , 839 S.W.2d 196 (1992).

2019See McNutt v. Yates , 2013 Ark. 427 , at 6, 430 S.W.3d 91 , 96 ; Anderson v. Douglas , 310 Ark. 633 , 839 S.W.2d 196 (1992).

12019–2019
Moore v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2018Dep't of Human Servs. , 2015 Ark.

12018–2018
Hudson v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
arkctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2017Id.

12017–2017
Lively v. Arkansas Department of Human Services green
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2017Id. ■ ' The termination-of-parental-rights analysis is twofold; it requires the circuit court to find that the parent is unfit and that termination is in the best interest of the child.

12017–2017
Young v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. neutral
arkctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2014The goal continued to be reunification of Young and B.Y., and B.Y. was to remain in DHS custody. 2 B.Y. began residing at Easter Seals, a residential-care facility, at some point subsequent to this order, and testimony at the termination-of-parental-rights hearing suggested that he would remain at Easter Seals for at least another year. 3 Cite as 2014 Ark.

12014–2014
Long v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services neutral
ark · 2007
1 sentence

2007O., and Joseph Brown. 2 We note that footnote 2 from Long v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 369 Ark. 74 , 250 S.W 3d 560 (2007) states: Notably, the circuit court, in its termination order, did not take judicial notice and incorporate by reference into the record all pleadings and testimony in the case that occurred before the termination-of-parental-rights hearing.

12007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341 (8)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 75 (1979–2024) NC 67 (2002–2026) PA 43 (1997–2026) AL 31 (1987–2017) NJ 21 (2000–2022) IA 21 (1990–2026) IN 13 (1991–2019) IL 13 (2003–2026) UT 11 (1997–2020) MO 11 (1988–2023) CO 11 (2007–2026) CA 9 (1995–2022) AR 9 (2007–2024) HI 8 (2021–2026) NM 8 (2007–2023) GA 7 (1999–2025) NE 5 (1987–2016) DE 4 (2002–2025) WI 4 (1991–1992) VT 4 (2012–2017) MI 4 (2010–2019) RI 3 (2001–2011) OK 3 (1997–2021) ME 3 (2018–2020) MT 3 (1995–2001) FL 3 (1998–2025) ND 3 (1976–2007) TN 2 (2017–2020) DC 2 (2003–2018) WY 2 (2021–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check