Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1958–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Christ Cella, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
green
1 sentence1987Where a taxpayer has maintained adequate books, the auditor cannot ignore them and instead rely on external indices (see, Tax Law § 1138 [a] [1]; Matter of Christ Cella, Inc. v State Tax Commn., 102 AD2d 352 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Payn v. Lyras
neutral
1 sentence1984Without that provision such an individual purchaser could not be counted for that purpose, but nothing in it suggests an intention to proscribe the purchase by a corporate tenant in occupancy, against whom the sponsor has not seen fit prior to offering its plan to utilize the procedures provided for in section 8605 of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws, of the shares allocated to its apartment, or permits the sponsor to restrict the corporate tenant’s statute-given right to purchase (Payn v Lyras, 91 AD2d 557 , app withdrawn 59 NY2d 970 ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
455 Seventh Avenue, Inc. v. Frederick Hussey Realty Corp.
green
1 sentence1982To hold that the tenant is responsible for payment of such additional net rent would be inequitable and a forfeiture, as such an interpre tation is not clearly within the provisions of the lease (see 455 Seventh Ave. v Hussey Realty Corp., 295 NY 166 ). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Tronolone
green
1 sentence1981(Tickner v Allen, supra; also Camp v Camp 24 App Div 866 .) “[T]he test appears to be whether or not in the instant case there was surrender of conscientious convictions on one material issue by some jurors in return for a relinquishment of matters in their like settled opinion on another issue.” (Boudreau v Damas Food Mart Corp., 49 Misc 2d 913, 915 , revd on other grounds 52 Misc 2d 930 .) Practically restated, if “[b]y a tit-for-tat process jurors favoring no liability will yield to those favoring high damages by agreeing to liability with a reduced award,” or where liability is found but d | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Boudreau v. Damas Food Mart Corp.
neutral
1 sentence1981(Tickner v Allen, supra; also Camp v Camp 24 App Div 866 .) “[T]he test appears to be whether or not in the instant case there was surrender of conscientious convictions on one material issue by some jurors in return for a relinquishment of matters in their like settled opinion on another issue.” (Boudreau v Damas Food Mart Corp., 49 Misc 2d 913, 915 , revd on other grounds 52 Misc 2d 930 .) Practically restated, if “[b]y a tit-for-tat process jurors favoring no liability will yield to those favoring high damages by agreeing to liability with a reduced award,” or where liability is found but d | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Boudreau v. Damas Food Market Corp.
neutral
1 sentence1981(Tickner v Allen, supra; also Camp v Camp 24 App Div 866 .) “[T]he test appears to be whether or not in the instant case there was surrender of conscientious convictions on one material issue by some jurors in return for a relinquishment of matters in their like settled opinion on another issue.” (Boudreau v Damas Food Mart Corp., 49 Misc 2d 913, 915 , revd on other grounds 52 Misc 2d 930 .) Practically restated, if “[b]y a tit-for-tat process jurors favoring no liability will yield to those favoring high damages by agreeing to liability with a reduced award,” or where liability is found but d | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Mutual Life Insurance v. Tailored Woman, Inc.
green
1 sentence1958Co. v. Tailored Woman ( 309 N. Y. 248 , affg. 283 App. Div. 173 ) does not hold anything to the contrary. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Mutual Life Insurance v. Tailored Woman, Inc.
green
1 sentence1958Co. v. Tailored Woman ( 309 N. Y. 248 , affg. 283 App. Div. 173 ) does not hold anything to the contrary. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.