Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1848–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leon v. Martinezgreen1 sentence2021We further conclude that the court properly denied defendants' motion insofar as it sought to dismiss the first cause of action against the District and the School Board for failure to state a cause of action ( see generally Leon v Martinez , 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gonzalez ex rel. Snow v. Povoski
green
1 sentence2021While plaintiff could have provided more information about the precise nature of the claim, the notice of claim included a detailed factual chronology and a description of her complaints that indirectly described a hostile work environment legal theory based on sexual harassment ( see generally Gonzalez v Povoski , 149 AD3d 1472 , 1474 [4th Dept 2017]). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Rodriguez v. State
green
1 sentence2005(See, e.g., Klos v State of New York, 19 AD3d 1173 [2005]; Rodriguez v State of New York, 8 AD3d 647 [2004]; Wharton v City Univ. of N.Y., 287 AD2d 559 [2001].) 3 That claimant, unfortunately, chose to later submit a claim that went way beyond the parameters of the notice of intention does not mean, as defendant suggests, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the entire claim, but instead means that to the extent that the claim goes beyond the notice of intention, the court lacks jurisdiction. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Klos v. State
green
1 sentence2005(See, e.g., Klos v State of New York, 19 AD3d 1173 [2005]; Rodriguez v State of New York, 8 AD3d 647 [2004]; Wharton v City Univ. of N.Y., 287 AD2d 559 [2001].) 3 That claimant, unfortunately, chose to later submit a claim that went way beyond the parameters of the notice of intention does not mean, as defendant suggests, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the entire claim, but instead means that to the extent that the claim goes beyond the notice of intention, the court lacks jurisdiction. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Wharton v. City University of New York
green
1 sentence2005(See, e.g., Klos v State of New York, 19 AD3d 1173 [2005]; Rodriguez v State of New York, 8 AD3d 647 [2004]; Wharton v City Univ. of N.Y., 287 AD2d 559 [2001].) 3 That claimant, unfortunately, chose to later submit a claim that went way beyond the parameters of the notice of intention does not mean, as defendant suggests, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the entire claim, but instead means that to the extent that the claim goes beyond the notice of intention, the court lacks jurisdiction. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. Kassis
green
1 sentence1998Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 29-30 , lv denied in part and dismissed in part 80 NY2d 1005). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. Kassis
green
1 sentence1998Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 29-30 , lv denied in part and dismissed in part 80 NY2d 1005). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Banta v. . Merchant
neutral
1 sentence1909The Court of Appeals granted a new trial ( 173 N. Y. 292 ) upon the ground that the statement of the referee was too indefinite to establish a reservation or to advise the purchaser of the precise nature of the claim. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Musier v. Trumpbour
neutral
1 sentence1848(See also Musier v. Trumpbour, 5 Wend. 274 ; Chamberlin v. Graves, 2 Hill, 504 ; Fitch v. Miller, 13 Wend. 66 ; Groff v. Griswold, 1 Denio, 432 , and cases there cited.) Applying the rules to be deduced from the cases cited, to the declaration in this cause, it is very evident that it contains all the elements of a good declaration in trover ; that is, it contains a statement of facts which, if proved, would sustain a technical declaration in that form of action ; and it is also very clear that the defendant must have understood the precise nature of the claim of the plaintiff, and the charact | 1 | 1848–1848 |
Fitch v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence1848(See also Musier v. Trumpbour, 5 Wend. 274 ; Chamberlin v. Graves, 2 Hill, 504 ; Fitch v. Miller, 13 Wend. 66 ; Groff v. Griswold, 1 Denio, 432 , and cases there cited.) Applying the rules to be deduced from the cases cited, to the declaration in this cause, it is very evident that it contains all the elements of a good declaration in trover ; that is, it contains a statement of facts which, if proved, would sustain a technical declaration in that form of action ; and it is also very clear that the defendant must have understood the precise nature of the claim of the plaintiff, and the charact | 1 | 1848–1848 |
Groff v. Griswold
neutral
1 sentence1848(See also Musier v. Trumpbour, 5 Wend. 274 ; Chamberlin v. Graves, 2 Hill, 504 ; Fitch v. Miller, 13 Wend. 66 ; Groff v. Griswold, 1 Denio, 432 , and cases there cited.) Applying the rules to be deduced from the cases cited, to the declaration in this cause, it is very evident that it contains all the elements of a good declaration in trover ; that is, it contains a statement of facts which, if proved, would sustain a technical declaration in that form of action ; and it is also very clear that the defendant must have understood the precise nature of the claim of the plaintiff, and the charact | 1 | 1848–1848 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.