Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1978–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Town of North Elba v. Grimditchgreen2 sentences2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). 2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). | 2 | 2 |
Langdon v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.green2 sentences2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). 2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Robertsgreen1 sentence2026In any case of statutory interpretation, the Court's task "is to ascertain the legislative intent and construe the pertinent statutes to effectuate that intent" ( People v Roberts , 31 NY3d 406, 418 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. System Properties, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). 2013Where the State, in its sovereign capacity, owns the body of water and submerged land, the State retains “absolute control” over it (98 AD3d at 192, quoting Langdon v Mayor of City of N.Y., 93 NY 129, 155-156 [1883]), and the State’s regulation “ ‘is not limited to . . . navigation but extends to every form of regulation in the public interest’ ” (id. at 188, quoting People v System Props., Inc., 281 App Div at 440 ). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Jackson v. City of New York
neutral
1 sentence1981(Jackson v City of New York, 107 Misc 2d 1052 ; see Slavin v City of New York, NYLJ, June 10, 1980, p 11, col 4.) The instant motion is not that easily resolved since plaintiff served a notice of claim under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law upon the city required “[i]n any case founded upon tort”. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Linden Industrial Park, Inc. v. Muller
neutral
1 sentence1978(Simcuski v Saeli, 57 AD2d 711 .) That decision has been criticized in a well-reasoned analysis by Dean McLaughlin as relying on a 50-year-old case and ignoring the modern case law supporting the developing doctrine of equitable estoppel. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.