Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
38 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garrett v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Garrett, 619 S.W.2d at 174 . 2015See Garrett, 619 S.W.2d at 174 . | 26 | 30 |
Allbright v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Allbright v. State, 13 S.W.3d 817, 819 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, pet. ref’d). 2012See Allbright v. State, 13 S.W.3d 817, 819 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2000, pet. ref’d). | 3 | 3 |
Carmouche v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Carmouche v. State , 10 S.W.3d at 332 (determining that the videotape of the stop contradicted the officer's testimony during a hearing on a motion to suppress regarding consent to search). 2007See Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d at 332 (determining that the videotape of the stop contradicted the officer’s testimony during a hearing on a motion to suppress regarding consent to search). | 2 | 2 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence2022Evid. 401; Miller, 36 S.W.3d at 507 (explaining that evidence must be both material and probative to be relevant). | 1 | 1 |
Montgomery, Jeri Dawngreen1 sentence2018See Montgomery v. State, 369 S.W.3d 188, 192 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Nichols v. William A. Taylor, Inc.green1 sentence1986Nichols v. William A. Taylor, Inc., 662 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1983, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.