Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Burdgegreen2 sentences2009State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 , rev allowed, 345 Or 460 (2008); see also State v. Burdge, 295 Or 1, 14 , 664 P2d 1076 (1983) (exclusion of witness testimony based on an inadvertent violation of an order to exclude witnesses from the courtroom was reversible error). 6 Analogizing to those settled principles, we first conclude that, because the trial court continued the December 12 hearing until January, when defendant Baker was able to be present, Baker ultimately was not prejudiced by the state’s failure to arrange his transport. 7 Additionally, the record does not dem 2009State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 , rev allowed, 345 Or 460 (2008); see also State v. Burdge, 295 Or 1, 14 , 664 P2d 1076 (1983) (exclusion of witness testimony based on an inadvertent violation of an order to exclude witnesses from the courtroom was reversible error). 6 Analogizing to those settled principles, we first conclude that, because the trial court continued the December 12 hearing until January, when defendant Baker was able to be present, Baker ultimately was not prejudiced by the state’s failure to arrange his transport. 7 Additionally, the record does not dem | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Phillips
green
1 sentence2009State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 , rev allowed, 345 Or 460 (2008); see also State v. Burdge, 295 Or 1, 14 , 664 P2d 1076 (1983) (exclusion of witness testimony based on an inadvertent violation of an order to exclude witnesses from the courtroom was reversible error). 6 Analogizing to those settled principles, we first conclude that, because the trial court continued the December 12 hearing until January, when defendant Baker was able to be present, Baker ultimately was not prejudiced by the state’s failure to arrange his transport. 7 Additionally, the record does not dem | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Vondehn
green
2 sentences2009State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 , rev allowed, 345 Or 460 (2008); see also State v. Burdge, 295 Or 1, 14 , 664 P2d 1076 (1983) (exclusion of witness testimony based on an inadvertent violation of an order to exclude witnesses from the courtroom was reversible error). 6 Analogizing to those settled principles, we first conclude that, because the trial court continued the December 12 hearing until January, when defendant Baker was able to be present, Baker ultimately was not prejudiced by the state’s failure to arrange his transport. 7 Additionally, the record does not dem 2009State v. Vondehn, 219 Or App 492, 509-10 , 184 P3d 567 , rev allowed, 345 Or 460 (2008); see also State v. Burdge, 295 Or 1, 14 , 664 P2d 1076 (1983) (exclusion of witness testimony based on an inadvertent violation of an order to exclude witnesses from the courtroom was reversible error). 6 Analogizing to those settled principles, we first conclude that, because the trial court continued the December 12 hearing until January, when defendant Baker was able to be present, Baker ultimately was not prejudiced by the state’s failure to arrange his transport. 7 Additionally, the record does not dem | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Oregon v. Hass
green
1 sentence2004In response, the Supreme Court explained that that was “not the law and surely must be an inadvertent error; in any event, we reject it.” Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Arkansas v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2004The Supreme Court later reaffirmed Hass in Arkansas v. Sullivan, 532 US 769 , 121 S Ct 1876 , 149 L Ed 2d 994 (2001). 2004The Supreme Court later reaffirmed Hass in Arkansas v. Sullivan, 532 US 769 , 121 S Ct 1876 , 149 L Ed 2d 994 (2001). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State Highway Commission v. State Construction Co.
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 436-37 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Chiles v. Robertson
green
1 sentence1989We stated that the trial court held that defendants “engaged in oppressive conduct toward plaintiffs with respect to those leases that contained reasonableness clauses * * *.” 94 Or App at 639 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Reinhart v. State Accident Insurance Fund
neutral
1 sentence1980The issue in this case and in the companion case of State v. Brown, 48 Or App 223 , 616 P2d 582 (1980) is whether jeopardy has attached and prohibits a retrial when, in defendant’s first trial, due to the bailiff’s inadvertent error, the jury saw the defendant in handcuffs and the trial court granted the defendant’s subsequent motion for mistrial. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.