Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Clinton Bernard Frazier-Elgreen2 sentences2015See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) ([t]he particular requirement that a request for self- representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation . . .), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. 2009See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) (“[t]he particular requirement that a request for self-representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. | 2 | 3 |
Sanders v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) ([t]he particular requirement that a request for self- representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation . . .), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. 2009See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) (“[t]he particular requirement that a request for self-representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. | 2 | 2 |
Morris v. Apfelgreen2 sentences2015See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) ([t]he particular requirement that a request for self- representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation . . .), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. 2009See United States v. Frazier-El, 204 F.3d 553, 558 (4th Cir.) (“[t]he particular requirement that a request for self-representation be clear and unequivocal is necessary to protect against an inadvertent waiver of the right to counsel by a defendant’s occasional musings on the benefits of self-representation” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 994 , 121 S. Ct. 487 , 148 L. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Richard Eugene Mearsgreen1 sentence1982See, e.g., United States v. Means, 614 F.2d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir. 1966); Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613 , 42 A.2d 128 (1945); Neuman v. Wildermann, 35 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gaynor v. Union Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2019We plainly are not.19 The defendant’s alleged practices could hardly be character- ized as simply a ‘‘technical violation’’ of a statute; Nor- mand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National Bank, supra, 230 Conn. 524 ; an inadvertent violation of a statute; Gaynor v. Union Trust Co., 216 Conn. 458, 483 , 582 A.2d 190 (1990); or an isolated incident of a good faith mistake. 2019We plainly are not.19 The defendant’s alleged practices could hardly be character- ized as simply a ‘‘technical violation’’ of a statute; Nor- mand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National Bank, supra, 230 Conn. 524 ; an inadvertent violation of a statute; Gaynor v. Union Trust Co., 216 Conn. 458, 483 , 582 A.2d 190 (1990); or an isolated incident of a good faith mistake. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Dlugokecki v. Vieira
neutral
1 sentence2010The wrongful conduct at issue could take virtually any form, but must induce a fearful state of mind in the other party, which makes it impossible for [the party] to exercise his own free will.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cox v. Burdick, 98 Conn. App. 167,177-78 , 907 A.2d 1282 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 951 , 912 A.2d 482 (2006). *740 In its memorandum of decision, the court stated that these claims were “without merit.” As previously indicated, the court found that the plaintiffs use of the incorrect name on the loan documents was an inadvertent error. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Cox v. Burdick
green
1 sentence2010The wrongful conduct at issue could take virtually any form, but must induce a fearful state of mind in the other party, which makes it impossible for [the party] to exercise his own free will.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cox v. Burdick, 98 Conn. App. 167,177-78 , 907 A.2d 1282 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 951 , 912 A.2d 482 (2006). *740 In its memorandum of decision, the court stated that these claims were “without merit.” As previously indicated, the court found that the plaintiffs use of the incorrect name on the loan documents was an inadvertent error. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Cox v. Burdick
neutral
2 sentences2010The wrongful conduct at issue could take virtually any form, but must induce a fearful state of mind in the other party, which makes it impossible for [the party] to exercise his own free will.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cox v. Burdick, 98 Conn. App. 167,177-78 , 907 A.2d 1282 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 951 , 912 A.2d 482 (2006). *740 In its memorandum of decision, the court stated that these claims were “without merit.” As previously indicated, the court found that the plaintiffs use of the incorrect name on the loan documents was an inadvertent error. 2010The wrongful conduct at issue could take virtually any form, but must induce a fearful state of mind in the other party, which makes it impossible for [the party] to exercise his own free will.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cox v. Burdick, 98 Conn. App. 167,177-78 , 907 A.2d 1282 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 951 , 912 A.2d 482 (2006). *740 In its memorandum of decision, the court stated that these claims were “without merit.” As previously indicated, the court found that the plaintiffs use of the incorrect name on the loan documents was an inadvertent error. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Heinze v. State
green
2 sentences1982See, e.g., United States v. Means, 614 F.2d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir. 1966); Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613 , 42 A.2d 128 (1945); Neuman v. Wildermann, 35 N.J. 1982See, e.g., United States v. Means, 614 F.2d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir. 1966); Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613 , 42 A.2d 128 (1945); Neuman v. Wildermann, 35 N.J. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
NEUMANN EX REL. NEUMANN v. Wildermann
green
1 sentence1982See, e.g., United States v. Means, 614 F.2d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir. 1966); Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613 , 42 A.2d 128 (1945); Neuman v. Wildermann, 35 N.J. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
United States v. George William Henson, United States of America v. Charles v. Wheeler, United States of America v. Harold Bruce Staton
green
1 sentence1982See, e.g., United States v. Means, 614 F.2d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Henson, 365 F.2d 282 , 284 (6th Cir. 1966); Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613 , 42 A.2d 128 (1945); Neuman v. Wildermann, 35 N.J. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.