Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2018"Absent a clear showing of prejudice[,] an inadvertent violation of a sequestration order does not trigger automatic exclusion of the witness' testimony." State v. Williams, 404 N.J. 2018Nevertheless, "Absent a clear showing of prejudice[,] an inadvertent violation of a sequestration order does not trigger automatic exclusion of the witness' testimony." Williams, 404 N.J. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Tillmangreen2 sentences2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). 2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 2 |
Morrissey v. Brewergreen1 sentence2019Quoting Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 480 (1972), the court concluded parole revocation "is constitutional because [it] 'deprives an individual, not of the absolute liberty to which every citizen is entitled, but only of the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions.'" The court noted defendant agreed to be sentenced to PSL and "to be subjected to parole revocation in the event he violated the conditions of PSL." Finding no error, other than the inadvertent error of counsel in the supplemental plea form that was addressed and corrected at the plea | 1 | 1 |
Judy Komlodi v. Anne Picciano, M.D. (071301)green1 sentence2018A-4067-16T2 16 See Komlodi v. Picciano, 217 N.J. 387, 418 (2014) ("A superseding or intervening act is one that breaks the chain of causation linking a defendant's wrongful act and an injury or harm suffered by a plaintiff." (internal quotation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Joiner v. Deckardgreen1 sentence2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
Haushalter v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valleygreen1 sentence2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). 2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
Myers v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence1995Id. at 20. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Horton
green
2 sentences2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). 2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 2 | 1996–2008 |
State v. Dayton
green
2 sentences1999In 1996 the Appellate Division in the case of State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76 , at page 89, 678 A. 2d 299 the Court followed the procedure recommended in the Tillman, supra, case and said: There is no automatic exclusionary rule based on a witness' inadvertent violation of a sequestration order by sitting in the court room. 1999In 1996 the Appellate Division in the case of State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76 , at page 89, 678 A. 2d 299 the Court followed the procedure recommended in the Tillman, supra, case and said: There is no automatic exclusionary rule based on a witness' inadvertent violation of a sequestration order by sitting in the court room. | 2 | 1999–2008 |
State v. Czachor
green
1 sentence2025"Absent a clear showing of prejudice an inadvertent violation of a sequestration order does not trigger automatic exclusion of the witness'[s] testimony." Ibid. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Figone
green
1 sentence2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Tillman
green
1 sentence2008See State v. Smith, 55 N.J. 476, 483 , 262 A. 2d 868 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 232 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 256 (1970); State v. Dayton, 292 N.J.Super. 76, 91 , 678 A. 2d *813 299 (App.Div.1996); State v. Horton, 199 N.J.Super. 368, 372-73 , 489 A. 2d 1164 (App.Div.1985); State v. Tillman, 122 N.J.Super. 137, 143-44 , 299 A. 2d 419 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 62 N.J. 428 , 302 A. 2d 132 (1973). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2004The court then denied defendant’s motion to appear pro se made pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), reasoning that defendant did not knowingly and voluntarily waive the assistance of counsel because he did not understand the danger that statements made before the jury during the course of representing himself might result in an inadvertent waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. 2004The court then denied defendant’s motion to appear pro se made pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), reasoning that defendant did not knowingly and voluntarily waive the assistance of counsel because he did not understand the danger that statements made before the jury during the course of representing himself might result in an inadvertent waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Horton v. California
green
2 sentences1995The purpose of the inadvertent requirement is to insure that a "plain-view seizure will not turn an initially valid (and therefore limited) search into a `general one[.]'" Horton, supra, 496 U.S. at 137-38 , 110 S.Ct. at 2308 , 110 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (quoting Coolidge, supra, 403 U.S. at 470 , 91 S.Ct. at 2039 , 29 L.Ed. 2d at 585 ). 1995The purpose of the inadvertent requirement is to insure that a "plain-view seizure will not turn an initially valid (and therefore limited) search into a `general one[.]'" Horton, supra, 496 U.S. at 137-38 , 110 S.Ct. at 2308 , 110 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (quoting Coolidge, supra, 403 U.S. at 470 , 91 S.Ct. at 2039 , 29 L.Ed. 2d at 585 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Bruzzese
green
2 sentences1995The first question is: Did the police know in advance "where the evidence was located ... [?]" Bruzzese, supra, 94 N.J. at 236 , 463 A. 2d 320 . 1995The first question is: Did the police know in advance "where the evidence was located ... [?]" Bruzzese, supra, 94 N.J. at 236 , 463 A. 2d 320 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
green
2 sentences1995The purpose of the inadvertent requirement is to insure that a "plain-view seizure will not turn an initially valid (and therefore limited) search into a `general one[.]'" Horton, supra, 496 U.S. at 137-38 , 110 S.Ct. at 2308 , 110 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (quoting Coolidge, supra, 403 U.S. at 470 , 91 S.Ct. at 2039 , 29 L.Ed. 2d at 585 ). 1995The purpose of the inadvertent requirement is to insure that a "plain-view seizure will not turn an initially valid (and therefore limited) search into a `general one[.]'" Horton, supra, 496 U.S. at 137-38 , 110 S.Ct. at 2308 , 110 L.Ed. 2d at 123 (quoting Coolidge, supra, 403 U.S. at 470 , 91 S.Ct. at 2039 , 29 L.Ed. 2d at 585 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Konzelman
neutral
2 sentences1987State v. Konzelman, 204 N.J.Super. 389 (Law.Div.1985) dealt with a New Jersey officer’s inadvertent violation of New York statutory law governing blood sample requests and concluded that the officer’s “conduct was constitutionally reasonable.” Id. at 394 . 1987State v. Konzelman, 204 N.J.Super. 389 (Law.Div.1985) dealt with a New Jersey officer’s inadvertent violation of New York statutory law governing blood sample requests and concluded that the officer’s “conduct was constitutionally reasonable.” Id. at 394 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
United States v. Rosenstriech
green
1 sentence1957In a later case in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Rosenstreich, 204 F. 2d 321 (1953), the defendant was sentenced June 30, 1952 on a conviction for conspiracy (a) to pay a fine of $1,000, to be paid within a week, and to stand committed until the fine was paid, and (b) to be imprisoned for one year, execution to be suspended and defendant to be placed on probation; July 8, 1952, the judge vacated the sentence and resentenced defendant by (1) increasing the fine to $10,000 and (2) by imposing imprisonment for a term of one year less ten days with suspension of execution a | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Barrow v. United States
neutral
2 sentences1955Cf. Jordan v. United States, 4 Cir., 60 F. 2 d 4, 6, with Barrow v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 128 , 295 F. 949 . 1955Cf. Jordan v. United States, 4 Cir., 60 F. 2 d 4, 6, with Barrow v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 128 , 295 F. 949 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.