5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Martinez
green
1 sentence2026Enrique-Martinez, 341 Or App at 22 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Johns
green
2 sentences2012The only specific mention the state made of any of the facts relating to the May 6-7, 1994, incident was to argue, pursuant to the third step of the test described in State v. Johns, 301 Or 535 , 725 P2d 312 (1986), that the victims in each prior incident were “in the same class as the victim in the present case,” because “[s]everal [of the victims] were particularly vulnerable. 2012The only specific mention the state made of any of the facts relating to the May 6-7, 1994, incident was to argue, pursuant to the third step of the test described in State v. Johns, 301 Or 535 , 725 P2d 312 (1986), that the victims in each prior incident were “in the same class as the victim in the present case,” because “[s]everal [of the victims] were particularly vulnerable. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Gaines
green
2 sentences2009State v. Gaines, 346 Or. 160 , 206 P.3d 1042 (2009). 2009State v. Gaines, 346 Or. 160 , 206 P.3d 1042 (2009). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Hill v. Qwest
green
2 sentences2005Hill v. Qwest, 178 Or App 137, 143 , 35 P3d 1051 (2001). 4 The statute applies only to contracts that implicate interstate commerce. 2005Hill v. Qwest, 178 Or App 137, 143 , 35 P3d 1051 (2001). 4 The statute applies only to contracts that implicate interstate commerce. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Mattiza v. Foster
green
1 sentence1999The Supreme Court made clear in Matizza, however, that a party’s perception of the merit of its position is relevant only to the third step of the analysis, whether the claim was brought for an improper purpose. 311 Or at 8-9 .* * 4 The only issue at the second step is whether the claim was entirely devoid of legal or factual support at the time it was made. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.