Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Knightgreen2 sentences2016Knight, 473 Mich at 343 . 2016Knight, 473 Mich at 343 . | 1 | 3 |
Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Associationgreen1 sentence2020See Pirgu, 499 Mich at 282 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller-El v. Dretke
green
2 sentences2016At Batson’s third step, the trial judge must evaluate the plausibility of the prosecutor’s race-neutral explanation for a strike “in light of all evidence with a bearing on it.” Dretke, 545 US at 251-252 . 2016At Batson’s third step, the trial judge must evaluate the plausibility of the prosecutor’s race-neutral explanation for a strike “in light of all evidence with a bearing on it.” Miller-El v Dretke, 545 US at 251 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Miller-El v. Cockrell
green
2 sentences2015“Since Batson, the Supreme Court has commented that -5- the establishment of purposeful discrimination ‘comes down to whether the trial court finds the . . . race-neutral explanations to be credible.’ ” Bell, 473 Mich at 283 , quoting Miller-El v Cockrell, 537 US 322, 339 ; 123 S Ct 1029 ; 154 L Ed 2d 931 (2003). 2015“Since Batson, the Supreme Court has commented that -5- the establishment of purposeful discrimination ‘comes down to whether the trial court finds the . . . race-neutral explanations to be credible.’ ” Bell, 473 Mich at 283 , quoting Miller-El v Cockrell, 537 US 322, 339 ; 123 S Ct 1029 ; 154 L Ed 2d 931 (2003). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Bell
green
1 sentence2015“Since Batson, the Supreme Court has commented that -5- the establishment of purposeful discrimination ‘comes down to whether the trial court finds the . . . race-neutral explanations to be credible.’ ” Bell, 473 Mich at 283 , quoting Miller-El v Cockrell, 537 US 322, 339 ; 123 S Ct 1029 ; 154 L Ed 2d 931 (2003). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Purkett v. Elem
green
1 sentence2014Further, at the third step of the analysis, “implausible or fantastic justifications may (and probably will) be found to be pretexts for purposeful discrimination.” Purkett, 514 US at 768 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Watson
green
1 sentence2002Watson, supra at 577 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin
green
1 sentence2000As we explained in Lopatin, supra at 240: [A]fter determining the recommended sanction, the disciplinary body moves to the third step of the analysis and considers the relevant aggravating and mitigating factors. *205 On review of these factors, it then decides whether to increase or decrease the sanction. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.