Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scott Estategreen2 sentences2017See Basile v. H & R Block, Inc., 52 A.3d 1202, 1210 (Pa. 2012) (noting "the 'intensely fact -specific' nature of this inquiry"); In re Estate of Scott, 316 A.2d 883, 885 (Pa. 1974) ("The concept of a confidential relationship cannot be reduced to a catalogue of specific circumstances, invariably falling to the left or right of a definitional line. . . . [E]ach case must be analyzed on its own facts."). 2017See Basile v. H & R Block, Inc., 617 Pa. 212 , 62 A.3d 1202, 1210 (2012) (noting “the ‘intensely fact-specific’ nature of this inquiry”); In re Estate of Scott, 455 Pa. 429 , 316 A.2d 883, 885 (1974) (“The concept of a confidential relationship cannot be reduced to a catalogue of specific circumstances, invariably falling to the left or right of a definitional line. ... [E]ach case must be analyzed on its own facts.”). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Andrewsgreen1 sentence2017See Commonwealth v. Andrews, 768 A.2d 309, 313-314 (Pa. 2001) (holding that a challenge to whether an appellant’s -3- J-S57012-17 criminal conduct amounted to one conspiracy or more is a fact-driven inquiry and constitutes a sufficiency claim, rather than a non-waivable illegality of the sentence issue). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence2017To prove criminal conspiracy, the Commonwealth must show that an appellant “1) entered into an agreement to commit or aid in an unlawful act with another person or persons; 2) with a shared criminal intent; and 3) an overt act was done in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 135 A.3d 1097, 1102 (Pa. Super. 2016) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Kerry-X v. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence2017See Basile v. H & R Block, Inc., 52 A.3d 1202, 1210 (Pa. 2012) (noting "the 'intensely fact -specific' nature of this inquiry"); In re Estate of Scott, 316 A.2d 883, 885 (Pa. 1974) ("The concept of a confidential relationship cannot be reduced to a catalogue of specific circumstances, invariably falling to the left or right of a definitional line. . . . [E]ach case must be analyzed on its own facts."). | 1 | 1 |
Basile v. H & R Block, Inc.green1 sentence2017See Basile v. H & R Block, Inc., 617 Pa. 212 , 62 A.3d 1202, 1210 (2012) (noting “the ‘intensely fact-specific’ nature of this inquiry”); In re Estate of Scott, 455 Pa. 429 , 316 A.2d 883, 885 (1974) (“The concept of a confidential relationship cannot be reduced to a catalogue of specific circumstances, invariably falling to the left or right of a definitional line. ... [E]ach case must be analyzed on its own facts.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Glass
green
2 sentences2020The MMA has altered the fact of marijuana’s previously universal illegality, and probable cause is a fact- driven standard “not readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.” Glass, 754 A.2d at 663 . 2020The MMA has altered the fact of marijuana’s previously universal illegality, and probable cause is a fact- driven standard “not readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.” Glass, 754 A.2d at 663 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.