Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPgreen2 sentences2024Determining "[w]hether a particular sort of work is within a party's usual course of 6 business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no 'litmus paper' test." Id. at 402 (quoting McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 298 S.W.3d 473, 480 (Mo. banc 2009)). 2022In so defining “usual business,” the Bass Court specifically sought to exclude from its definition “specialized or episodic work that is essential to the employer but not within the employer’s usual business as performed by its employees.” Id.10 “Whether a particular sort of work is within a party’s usual course of business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no ‘litmus paper’ test.” McCracken, 298 S.W.3d at 480 (citation and quotation marks omitted). 9 Specifically, the Bass Court indicated that the cases utilizing the essential/integral test were likely written broadly so as to accommodate th | 3 | 4 |
Ferguson v. Air-Hydraulics Companygreen2 sentences2019"Whether a particular sort of work is within a party's usual course of business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no 'litmus paper' test." McCracken, 298 S.W.3d at 480 (quoting Ferguson v. Air-Hydraulics Co., 492 S.W.2d 130, 135 (Mo. App. 1973). 2009Whether a particular sort of work is within a party’s usual course of business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no “ ‘litmus paper’ test.” Ferguson v. Air-Hydraulics Co., 492 S.W.2d 130, 135 (Mo.App.1973). | 2 | 2 |
Marriage of Basham v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2016Basham, 239 S.W.3d at 727 . 2010“Whether or not [sic] Father’s conduct was intentional and contumacious is a fact-driven inquiry.” Basham v. Williams, 239 S.W.3d 717, 727 (Mo.App. | 1 | 4 |
Ag v. Rmdgreen1 sentence2016See A.G., 730 S.W.2d at 546-47 . 8 Whether Mother's actions constituted intentional and contumacious failure to abide by the trial court's order is a fact-driven inquiry. | 1 | 1 |
Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. v. Davenportgreen2 sentences2000Corp., 29 F.3d 1439 , 1445 (9th Cir.1994). “[Assessing the ‘circumstances’ requires a fact-driven analysis.” Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. v. Davenport, 272 Ga. 173 , 527 S.E.2d 548, 550 (2000) (citing Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana, 971 F.Supp. 229, 236 (W.D.La.1997), aff'd. 140 F.3d 1038 (5th Cir.1998)). 2000Corp., 29 F.3d 1439 , 1445 (9th Cir.1994). “[Assessing the ‘circumstances’ requires a fact-driven analysis.” Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. v. Davenport, 272 Ga. 173 , 527 S.E.2d 548, 550 (2000) (citing Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana, 971 F.Supp. 229, 236 (W.D.La.1997), aff'd. 140 F.3d 1038 (5th Cir.1998)). | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana, Inc.green1 sentence2000Corp., 29 F.3d 1439 , 1445 (9th Cir.1994). “[Assessing the ‘circumstances’ requires a fact-driven analysis.” Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. v. Davenport, 272 Ga. 173 , 527 S.E.2d 548, 550 (2000) (citing Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana, 971 F.Supp. 229, 236 (W.D.La.1997), aff'd. 140 F.3d 1038 (5th Cir.1998)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.
green
2 sentences2024Determining "[w]hether a particular sort of work is within a party's usual course of 6 business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no 'litmus paper' test." Id. at 402 (quoting McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 298 S.W.3d 473, 480 (Mo. banc 2009)). 2018"Whether a particular sort of work is within a party's usual course of business is a fact-driven inquiry; there is no 'litmus paper' test." Id. | 5 | 2009–2024 |
cluster 674666
green
1 sentence2000Corp., 29 F.3d 1439 , 1445 (9th Cir.1994). “[Assessing the ‘circumstances’ requires a fact-driven analysis.” Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. v. Davenport, 272 Ga. 173 , 527 S.E.2d 548, 550 (2000) (citing Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana, 971 F.Supp. 229, 236 (W.D.La.1997), aff'd. 140 F.3d 1038 (5th Cir.1998)). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.