Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1933–1977 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mapp v. Ohiogreen2 sentences1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. 1969Ed. 2d 601 (1965), holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 6 L. | 1 | 3 |
Linkletter v. Walkerred2 sentences1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. 1968Appellant, however, contends that he was denied the right to counsel for appeal as guaranteed by Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963), arguing that if given a direct appeal, his judgment would not be “final” and he could thus raise his Mapp claim under Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S. Ct. 1731 (1965). | 1 | 2 |
Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. Shottgreen1 sentence1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Californiagreen1 sentence1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Soychak
green
2 sentences1977However, the failure of appellant and those with him in the apartment to close the window shades negates appellant’s argument that he was deprived of his privacy; and the fact that the observations of the police involved a trespass of private property is merely one factor to consider in determining the reasonableness of the visual intrusion: Commonwealth v. Soychak, 221 Pa.Super. 458, 462 , 289 A.2d 119 (1972). 1977However, the failure of appellant and those with him in the apartment to close the window shades negates appellant’s argument that he was deprived of his privacy; and the fact that the observations of the police involved a trespass of private property is merely one factor to consider in determining the reasonableness of the visual intrusion: Commonwealth v. Soychak, 221 Pa.Super. 458, 462 , 289 A.2d 119 (1972). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Halliday v. United States
green
1 sentence1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Commonwealth v. Godfrey
green
2 sentences1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. 1974Holliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 (1969); Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 434 Pa. 532 , 254 A. 2d 923 (1969); see also, Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) [holding that Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), prohibiting comment on the accused’s failure to testify, may be applied prospectively only], and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) [holding that the search and seizure rule of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was to be applied prospectively only]. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Douglas v. California
green
2 sentences1968Appellant, however, contends that he was denied the right to counsel for appeal as guaranteed by Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963), arguing that if given a direct appeal, his judgment would not be “final” and he could thus raise his Mapp claim under Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S. Ct. 1731 (1965). 1968Appellant, however, contends that he was denied the right to counsel for appeal as guaranteed by Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963), arguing that if given a direct appeal, his judgment would not be “final” and he could thus raise his Mapp claim under Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S. Ct. 1731 (1965). | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Wheeler v. United States
green
1 sentence1933And to the same effect are Wilson v. United States, 221 U. S. 361, 382 , and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U. S. 478 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Wilson v. United States
green
1 sentence1933And to the same effect are Wilson v. United States, 221 U. S. 361, 382 , and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U. S. 478 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Hale v. Henkel
green
1 sentence1933C., S. D., Ala. 1924), affirmed per curiam, sub nom., First National Bank of Mobile v. United States, 267 U. S. 576 ; that the search and seizure clause of the fourth amendment was not intended to interfere with the power of courts to compel the production, upon a trial in court, of documentary evidence: Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43, 73 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Tayloe v. United States
green
1 sentence1933C., S. D., Ala. 1924), affirmed per curiam, sub nom., First National Bank of Mobile v. United States, 267 U. S. 576 ; that the search and seizure clause of the fourth amendment was not intended to interfere with the power of courts to compel the production, upon a trial in court, of documentary evidence: Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43, 73 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.