Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Salvuccigreen2 sentences1996United States v. Salvucci, 448 U. S. 83, 85 (100 SC 2547, 65 LE2d 619) (1980). 1988United States v. Salvucci, 448 U. S. 83, 85 (100 SC 2547, 65 LE2d 619) (1980). | 2 | 2 |
Elliott v. Stategreen2 sentences2022See Select Committee on Constitutional Revisions, 1977-1981 (“Select Committee”), Transcript of Meetings, Committee to Revise Article I, meeting of Subcommittee to Revise Section I, Oct. 4, 1979, p. 69 (noting that the search and seizure clause had “been construed so many times” and a “tremendous body of law” developed on the words of that clause that “if we change much of that we’re going to open a complete new field”); id. at 97 (noting that the committee would “open up a keg of worms” if it “monkey[ed] with” the double jeopardy clause); id. at 103-106 (notwithstanding members’ uncertainty a 2022See Select Committee on Constitutional Revisions, 1977-1981 (“Select Committee”), Transcript of Meetings, Committee to Revise Article I, meeting of Subcommittee to Revise Section I, Oct. 4, 1979, p. 69 (noting that the search and seizure clause had “been construed so many times” and a “tremendous body of law” developed on the words of that clause that “if we change much of that we’re going to open a complete new field”); id. at 97 (noting that the committee would “open up a keg of worms” if it “monkey[ed] with” the double jeopardy clause); id. at 103-106 (notwithstanding members’ uncertainty a | 1 | 1 |
Gary v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Cf. Gary v. State, 262 Ga. 573, 574 ( 422 SE2d 426 ) (1992) (noting that the State may impose higher standards on searches and seizures than those required by the federal constitution, and holding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule recognized by the United States Supreme Court does not apply under Georgia law). 1997Cf. Gary v. State, 262 Ga. 573, 574 ( 422 SE2d 426 ) (1992) (noting that the State may impose higher standards on searches and seizures than those required by the federal constitution, and holding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule recognized by the United States Supreme Court does not apply under Georgia law). | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Allengreen2 sentences1986Coleman v. *137 Allen, 79 Ga. 637, 640 (1) ( 5 SE 204 ) (1887) is a peculiar case to cite for the meaning of the search and seizure clause in either event because it dealt with the charge of the court on the element of a want of probable cause in a tort case of malicious prosecution. 1986Coleman v. Allen, 79 Ga. 637, 640 (1) ( 5 SE 204 ) (1887) is a peculiar case to cite for the meaning of the search and seizure clause in either event because it dealt with the charge of the court on the element of a want of probable cause in a tort case of malicious prosecution. | 1 | 1 |
City of Atlanta v. Smithgreen2 sentences1928See also City of Atlanta v. Smith, 165 Ga. 146 ( 140 S. E. 369 ). 1928See also City of Atlanta v. Smith, 165 Ga. 146 ( 140 S. E. 369 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Olevik v. State
green
1 sentence2019Id., meeting of Subcommittee to Revise Section I, Oct. 4, 1979, p. 69 (noting that the search and seizure clause had “been construed so many times” and a “tremendous body of law” developed on the words of that clause that “if we change much of that we’re going to open a complete new field”); id., p. 97 (noting that the committee would “open up a keg of worms” if it “monkey[ed] with” the double jeopardy clause); id., pp. 103- 106 (notwithstanding members’ uncertainty about meaning of phrase “corruption of blood,” Justice Bowles noted that the phrase had been defined in case law, and another com | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Bibb County v. Hancock
green
1 sentence2019Id., meeting of Subcommittee to Revise Section I, Oct. 4, 1979, p. 69 (noting that the search and seizure clause had "been construed so many times" and a "tremendous body of law" developed on the words of that clause that "if we change much of that we're going to open a complete new field"); id., p. 97 (noting that the committee would "open up a keg of worms" if it "monkey[ed] with" the double-jeopardy clause); id., pp. 103-106 (notwithstanding members' uncertainty about meaning of phrase "corruption of blood," Justice Bowles noted that the phrase had been defined in case law, and another comm | 1 | 2019–2019 |
American Railway Express Co. v. Bailey
green
1 sentence1928In Kennemer v. State, 154 Ga. 139 (2) ( 113 S. E. 551 ), the Supreme Court of this State, having previously made a certain construction of the search and seizure clause of the Constitution of Georgia, declined to make a different construction in view of contrary decisions by the United States Supreme Court construing the corresponding clause of the Constitution of the United States. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Kennemer v. State
green
1 sentence1928In Kennemer v. State, 154 Ga. 139 (2) ( 113 S. E. 551 ), the Supreme Court of this State, having previously made a certain construction of the search and seizure clause of the Constitution of Georgia, declined to make a different construction in view of contrary decisions by the United States Supreme Court construing the corresponding clause of the Constitution of the United States. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.