Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaither Corporation v. Skinnergreen2 sentences2019The bar of the judgment in such cases extends not only to matters actually determined, but also to other matters which in the exercise of due diligence could have been presented for determination in the prior action.” Gerber, 219 S.W.3d at 918 (quoting Gaither Corp. v. Skinner, 241 N.C. 532 , 85 S.E.2d 909, 911 (1955)). 2019The bar of the judgment in such cases extends not only to matters actually determined, but also to other matters which in the exercise of due diligence could have been presented for determination in the prior action.” Gerber, 219 S.W.3d at 918 (quoting Gaither Corp. v. Skinner, 241 N.C. 532 , 85 S.E.2d 909, 911 (1955)). | 2 | 2 |
In Re JACOBE M.J.green1 sentence2018A. Yes. 15 the complete care of Father, as Father “has not been a 24/7 parent, aside from all of the mothers [of his other children] helping.” As we consider Father’s argument, we are mindful that in this phase of our analysis, “[t]he child’s best interests must be viewed from the child’s, rather than the parent’s, perspective.” White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 194 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “[W]hen the interests of the parent and the child conflict, courts are to resolve the conflict in favor of the rights and best interest of the child.” In re Jacobe M.J., 434 S.W.3d 565, 573 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013 | 1 | 1 |
White v. Moodygreen1 sentence2018A. Yes. 15 the complete care of Father, as Father “has not been a 24/7 parent, aside from all of the mothers [of his other children] helping.” As we consider Father’s argument, we are mindful that in this phase of our analysis, “[t]he child’s best interests must be viewed from the child’s, rather than the parent’s, perspective.” White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 194 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “[W]hen the interests of the parent and the child conflict, courts are to resolve the conflict in favor of the rights and best interest of the child.” In re Jacobe M.J., 434 S.W.3d 565, 573 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gerber v. Holcomb
green
1 sentence2019The bar of the judgment in such cases extends not only to matters actually determined, but also to other matters which in the exercise of due diligence could have been presented for determination in the prior action.” Gerber, 219 S.W.3d at 918 (quoting Gaither Corp. v. Skinner, 241 N.C. 532 , 85 S.E.2d 909, 911 (1955)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ridley v. Halliday
green
1 sentence1930Though, of course, where the life tenant’s interests are adverse he cannot represent subsequent contingent interests.” And in Ridley v. Halliday, supra, the court said, in substance, (at page 613), that the doctrine of virtual representation is based upon the assumption that the living representative will look after the interest of the contingent remaindermen in posse by bringing to the attention of the court the merits of the controversy, so far as they affect such unborn remaindermen. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuire
green
2 sentences1911R. v. McGuire, 219 U. S., 549, 565 , 31 Sup. Ct., 259, 55 L. 1911R. v. McGuire, 219 U. S., 549, 565 , 31 Sup. Ct., 259, 55 L. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.