Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zant v. Stephens
green
2 sentences2000Zant, 462 U.S. at 874-77 , 77 L. 2000Zant, 462 U.S. at 874-77 , 77 L. | 4 | 1996–2000 |
People v. Free
green
2 sentences1984Both the State and the defendant are allowed considerable leeway in presenting relevant evidence. ( People v. Free (1983), 94 Ill.2d 378, 422 .) In Free we held that the failure of the defendant to object to evidence concerning the victim's family at the second phase of the sentencing hearing constituted waiver. ( People v. Free (1983), 94 Ill.2d 378, 425 .) Defendant has shown us no reason why we should depart from our holding in Free and apply the plain-error rule in this case. 1984Both the State and the defendant are allowed considerable leeway in presenting relevant evidence. ( People v. Free (1983), 94 Ill.2d 378, 422 .) In Free we held that the failure of the defendant to object to evidence concerning the victim's family at the second phase of the sentencing hearing constituted waiver. ( People v. Free (1983), 94 Ill.2d 378, 425 .) Defendant has shown us no reason why we should depart from our holding in Free and apply the plain-error rule in this case. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.