sex offender registration requirement (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

sex offender registration requirement in Tennessee

5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State of Tennessee v. David Nagelegreen
tenn · 2011 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See State v. Nagele, 353 S.W.3d 112, 120-21 (Tenn. 2011) Second, Petitioner’s claim regarding the sex offender registration requirement does not constitute a colorable claim under Rule 36.1.

11
Strickland v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 ; Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Ward v. State green
tenn · 2010
2 sentences

2022As such, a trial court’s failure to advise regarding the sex offender registration requirement does not render a guilty plea constitutionally invalid, although, clearly, the better practice is for a trial court to advise a defendant “that a consequence of pleading guilty to an offense requiring sex offender registration is that the defendant must register as a sex offender[.]” Id.

2016Therefore, the court concluded that a “trial court‟s failure to advise [a defendant] of the sex offender registration requirement does not render [a defendant‟s] guilty plea constitutionally invalid.” Id.

42014–2024
Hill v. Lockhart green
scotus · 1985
1 sentence

2009See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 ; Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 .

12009–2009

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1977–2025) TX 50 (2001–2024) LA 9 (2000–2025) OH 7 (2006–2025) WI 7 (2004–2023) NY 7 (2010–2025) WA 6 (1994–2021) AZ 5 (1989–2026) TN 5 (2009–2024) NC 5 (2011–2025) IA 5 (2009–2024) IL 5 (2014–2021) MI 4 (2017–2021) VA 3 (1996–2007) MD 3 (2011–2013) SC 3 (2010–2019) MA 3 (2014–2017) CO 3 (2017–2021) IN 2 (2008–2018) AK 2 (2011–2018) MT 2 (2025–2026) WY 2 (2013–2017) GA 2 (2021–2021) MO 2 (2018–2021) UT 2 (2014–2025) ND 2 (1997–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check