Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hayesgreen1 sentence2013“This Court will uphold a trial court’s findings of fact in a suppression hearing unless the evidence preponderates otherwise.” State v. Hayes, 188 S.W.3d 505, 510 (Tenn. 2006) (citing State v. Odom, 928 S.W.2d 18, 23 (Tenn. 1996)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Odomgreen1 sentence2013“This Court will uphold a trial court’s findings of fact in a suppression hearing unless the evidence preponderates otherwise.” State v. Hayes, 188 S.W.3d 505, 510 (Tenn. 2006) (citing State v. Odom, 928 S.W.2d 18, 23 (Tenn. 1996)). | 1 | 1 |
Florida v. Royergreen2 sentences2010Richard’s detention “must be temporary and last no longer than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop.” Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500 , 103 S. Ct. 1319, 1325 (1983). “[T]he proper inquiry is whether during the detention, the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly.” State v. Simpson, 968 S.W.2d 776, 783 (Tenn. 1998). -9- Here, the record shows that Officer Love approached Richard’s vehicle to address the speeding violation. 2010Richard’s detention “must be temporary and last no longer than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop.” Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500 , 103 S. Ct. 1319, 1325 (1983). “[T]he proper inquiry is whether during the detention, the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly.” State v. Simpson, 968 S.W.2d 776, 783 (Tenn. 1998). -9- Here, the record shows that Officer Love approached Richard’s vehicle to address the speeding violation. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Simpsongreen1 sentence2010Richard’s detention “must be temporary and last no longer than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop.” Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500 , 103 S. Ct. 1319, 1325 (1983). “[T]he proper inquiry is whether during the detention, the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly.” State v. Simpson, 968 S.W.2d 776, 783 (Tenn. 1998). -9- Here, the record shows that Officer Love approached Richard’s vehicle to address the speeding violation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maryland v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2009The Court has noted that the risk of a violent encounter in a traffic-stop setting “stems not from the ordinary reaction of a motorist stopped for a speeding violation, but from the fact that evidence of a more serious crime might be uncovered during the stop.” Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. at 414 , 117 S. Ct. 886 . “[T]he motivation of a passenger to employ violence to prevent apprehension of such a crime,” the Court stated, “is every bit as great as that of the driver.” Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Commonwealth v. Kondor
neutral
2 sentences2005Cf. Com m onwealth v. Kondor, 438 Pa. Super. 147 , 651 A.2d 1135 (Pa. Super. 2005Cf. Com m onwealth v. Kondor, 438 Pa. Super. 147 , 651 A.2d 1135 (Pa. Super. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Whren v. United States
green
1 sentence1997However, it relies upon Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. ___ , 116 S. Ct. 1769 (1996), and State v. Davey Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn, Nos. 03C01-9502-CR-00052 & 03C01- 9502-CR-00053, Bradley County (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.